Skip to content

Is there enough money to pay off debt plus interest? A closer look

by on April 1, 2013
Is there enough money to pay off debt plus interest?

The elegant P<P+I equation points in the right direction but it is incomplete and needs further analysis. Not only does it ignore the velocity of circulation, but also the question whether the interest is spent back into circulation. The issue is important, both in terms of truth-seeking and Austrians and the Mainstream subverting the argument.

Can all debt be repaid in a usurious credit system? The P<P+I (P=Principal, I=Interest) equation suggests it cannot. For the longest time we have been maintaining that the principal is created, but not the interest and thus eternal indebtedness is part of the system. A closer look shows the problem is more complicated and the original proposition not per se correct.

Interest-Free Economics has always assumed that P=Money Supply (MS) if the money supply is debt-based. This ignores the crucial factor of velocity, the number of times the money supply changes hands in a given time span. The effective money supply (r(eal)MS) is Principal x Velocity: rMS = P x V.

Another vital issue is the question whether the interest is spent back into circulation. If it is not, it is bound to cause problems.

Here’s an analysis of the implications of these two overlooked factors:

A: slow circulation.
Let’s say P=100 and I=10 and velocity is 1. We are in an economy of two players.  Let’s say the loan is for a year and that it has to be repaid at the end of the year. My partner gives me the loan so we don’t need a third party.

We pay the other participant 100 at the beginning of the year. Velocity is 1 and P=MS, so he’ll buy something worth 100 from us at the end of it. It’s easy to see that at the end of the year we will have 100 income to pay off the principal, but we will have to borrow an extra 10 to pay off P + I.
So in this example the original proposition is correct.

B: Good circulation, interest not spent into circulation.
Now let’s see what happens if velocity is 20. I go into debt, pay my supplier and he buys with me. I save 1 because I know I need to pay interest at the end of the year, so I buy 99 worth with him. He buys 99 with me and I save another 1 for the interest payment. In the final transaction, I have saved 9, my partner buys 91 with me and I collect the remaining 1 for the interest payment. I have the interest, but only 90 for the principal.
It matters not, whether I save to settle the interest payment at the end of the year, or whether I pay the interest immediately, while the lender does not spend it. If the interest is not immediately circulated, no matter the speed of circulation of the remaining money supply, there will be a shortage of money. I will not have enough to pay off P + I.
Again: P < P + I still stands.

C: Good circulation, interest spent into circulation.
Now let’s say I pay the interest immediately and my partner spends the received interest back into circulation. Velocity is again 20.
So I buy 99 worth + I pay 1 interest.  He buys back 100 worth of goods. I again buy 99 worth + 1 interest. Etc.
In this example, after 20 (10 buys and sells each) transactions, I will have paid off the interest during the year and at the end of the period, I will have 100 to pay off the principal.

The conclusion is, that if velocity is high enough and the interest is immediately spent into circulation, the P + I > P equation does not mean that debt plus interest cannot be settled with only P as the money supply.

However, these are two big ifs. In fact: they both don’t fly.

Getting to the bottom of the issue
In the first place, velocity. As it happens, Usury is a key factor in destroying velocity of money. It greatly encourages hoarding, especially in the current banking system. Postponing paying your bills nets you income through interest. So Here’s a graph, courtesy of wiki, the green line shows velocity, the left axis shows the relevant scale:

File:M2VelocityEMratioUS052009.png

As we can see, velocity is very low in the economy, money changes hands a little more than once every two years. It went down even further during the last few years, because of the depression. Considering the the example above, it is clear that velocity is far from sufficient to allow interest payments on the money supply, meaning we have serious deflationary pressures because of interest payments.

Then the other issue: is the interest spent back into circulation? The answer is: far from all the interest payments are spent back into circulation. Sure, the banks pay their people massively bloated bribes (‘bonuses’) for their handiwork and to control their conscience, and they build major citadels (‘office buildings) everywhere, but banking is an incredibly profitable business and this profit is not spent back into circulation.

In the first place, banks use profit as capital reserve requirements for more lending. Basically this means the money is lent back into circulation, not spent. Because it is lent back into circulation, even more money is needed for interest payments, aggravating an already grim situation.

Secondly, there is the two loop economy. I discussed it in an article on stagflation. There are two economies. The real one, where we operate, actually producing all sorts of stuff. Then there is the financial economy. A large part of it is accessible only to insiders and the financial industry. Normal people can access it only via the Stock Exchange, where their assets are disowned through insider trading. Turnover in the financial economy dwarfs that of the real one. Most of the money out there is in the financial economy. This, I venture to suggest, is another reason why velocity is so slow: in the real economy money circulates much quicker, but most money is in the financial economy which is not counted in the GDP figures. Meaning only a small percentage of our money supply is used to finance the real economy. Here’s a graph of the financial economy:

Make no mistake: the two loop economy is real. Recently insider Mark Faber actually mentioned it, it’s the first time I ever saw it mentioned in the media.

The financial economy is where the big bucks are being made by the vampire class. Their derivatives, forex, insider trading. It’s where all their gains from the stock market and other fleecing of the non-sophisticated investors is going. Unfortunately for them they cannot really use this money in the real economy, because it would cause an immediate hyperinflation, but it does give them full control over the real economy and it is an important part of their domination. It also explains why QE1, 2, 3, x have not led to rising prices: There was a massive deflation in the financial economy as a result of the busted Mortgage Backed Securities hoax and Bernanke slyly fixed only that, while not adding any money to the real economy, which needs to be strangled with austerity, sequestration, the fiscal cliff and whatever tool they have to aggravate the depression.

The point is: much of the interest is siphoned off to the financial economy. Meaning it is not circulated back into the real one. Meaning usury does deflate the money supply and interest + debt can never be settled.

Conclusion
It’s an important issue. The Mainstream and the Austrians have been getting to terms with the original P + I > P equation. The argument in its original form is no longer operable. More importantly: we owe it to ourselves and the people we talk with to get to the heart of the matter and take both truth and their arguments seriously, if they have merit.

In an ideal scenario, when velocity is sufficient and the interest is spent back into circulation, principal plus interest can be repaid.

But for other reasons, the basic problem still is the same: velocity is very low in practice, making it impossible to pay for both and the leaking of money to the financial economy, the ‘upper loop’ is probably even worse.

I hope this article can lead to further discussion, perhaps the experts can shoot a hole in it, making it irrelevant or better. I’m not a mathematician, and I’m pretty sure people like Gauvin, Turmel or Montagne would put it more elegantly, but I hope to have made the point clear.

Please comment if you have anything to add and share this article with those you know are into this line of thinking.

Related:
We are in Stagflation
Debt Free Money alone does not solve Compound Interest
Why the Economy MUST Grow

Dick Eastman is the main thinker on the two loop economy, a phrase he coined. Unfortunately he does not operate a website, so he cannot be found on the web and there are no archives of his previous work to be searched. But Dick is one of the most outstanding economists out there, and he sends out emails on a daily basis, you can contact him at oldickeastman(at)q.com if you want to get to know his work.

About these ads
90 Comments
  1. Paul Clemmings permalink

    Great article, but communists have been saying this for years.

    • Really? Communists avoid the monetary system like the plague.

  2. Harsman permalink

    Money circulation is not create money but create wealth and interest. In order spent the interest back to circulation as a spend, only if all of money institutions (banks) are totally owned by state, thus all of the profit (interest) become government budget like Chinese banks.

  3. Jct: Sadly, P<P+I isn't a very elegant equation at all. So what if something smaller is smaller than something bigger. Quite the obvious and silly truism. Meaningless in itself. Now, using that relation to define the problem and solution is another matter. Money available = P borrowed; Debt: P+I owed.
    Survivors of mortgage death-gamble: P/(P+I).
    Losers: 1 – P/(P+I) = I/(P+I).
    Foreclosed Shift B inflation fraction: I/(P+I)!
    Now, that's mathematical elegance. But merely nothing something plus more is bigger than something isn't elegant, it's trite.

    • One good thing about P>P+I is the simplicity of showing that there will always be more debt (Principal + Interest) than money (Principal) in an interest bearing, debt money system like the one destroying humanity today. The more money created, the greater the differential; which is one reason why booms are followed by busts.

      Jct wrote: “Losers: 1 – P/(P+I) = I/(P+I)”

      While the above formulas may show what “might ” happen, they do not necessarily show what “will” happen. For example, if total Interest = $20 million and the total Principal = $100 million; then according to your formula, just over 16% of the borrowers will fail (assuming that this is all of the money available).

      16.6% = $20 million Interest / ($100 million Principal + $20 million Interest)

      The higher the interest, the greater the amount of defaults in this death gamble. If the Interest were $30 million, then the default rate would be 23%.

      The missing piece is that when a loan defaults, money may become available to other borrowers since the balance of the unpaid principal is not destroyed through repayment. I suspect that in the real economy, a percentage slightly lower than your calculated percentage would actually default.

      Regardless, creating money as interest bearing debt is a pyramid scheme and I think you are right on the mark in calling it a “death-gamble.”

  4. Napoleon was another person who did not know about the p&p impossibility equation of future charlatans; and he despised the credit (credibility) system

    Instead of inventing impossibility computer models, the enviro-freak Margrit Kennedy should come up to the sunlight and study reality. Similarly, instead of learning everything he knows about money from Lincoln, the willing agent of the money power Lucy Liu should check out historical facts, and not make harmful theories based on a completely false premise

    In 1797 the assignat came to an inglorious end; France reverted to silver coin; but economic desaster did not follow!! Napoleon became general manager of France at the end of 1799. During his 14 years France did not borrow, did not issue notes, silver coin was the sole currency of the country. The cost of 14 years’ defensive warfare was paid as it occured; the cost of public projects were also paid from money the state had in the treasury. The people of France went to work, earned silver coins, then they purchased what they had money for.
    The credit sytem of bankers and money men was not rampant in France.

    In 1814, Napoleon left France debt-free, and money in the Treasury !….. The enemies of freedom, the agents of the money power (Prussia, Russia, England, Habsburg empire) all used the credit sytem and the priting press to finance the war against Napoleon, and all of them were saddled with a large bonded debt, which, in the case of UK, was not extinguished until 1960…..

    The house of Romanov, true to form and nature, rushed to the aid of the money power when Napoleon tried to liberate Europe from the clutches of the London oligarchy; just as they rushed to the aid of the house of Rothschild during Lincoln’s war against the South; just as they rushed to the aid of the house of Habsburg when some people got silly ideas about national sovereignty; just as they rushed to the aid of England when Germany developed foolish day-dreams about railways to Baghdad.

    “The noble harbours of Antwerp and Flushing, which are capable of containing the largest fleets, and of protecting them against the ice from the sea, — the hydraulic works at Dunkirk, Havre, and Nice, –the immense harbour of Cherburg, — the maritime works at Venice, — the beautiful roads from Antwerp to Amsterdam ; from Mentz to Metz ; from Bordeaux to Bayonne; — the passes of the Simplon, of Mount Cenis, of Mount Geneve, of the Corniche, which open a communication through the Alps in four different directions ; and which exceed in grandeur, in boldness, and in skill of execution, all the works of the Romans ; in that alone you will find eight hundred millions; — the roads from the Pyrenees to the Alps, from Parma to Spezia, from Savona to Piedmont, –the bridges of Jena, Austerlitz, Des Arts, Sevres, Tours, Rouanne, Lyons, Turin, of the Isere, of the Durance, of Bordeaux, Rouen, &c. — the canal which connects the Rhine with the Rhone by the Doubs, and thus unites the North sea with the Mediterranean ; the canal which connects the Scheldt with the Somme, and thus joins Paris and Amsterdam; the canal which unites the Rance to the Vilaine; the canal of Arles, that of Pavia, and the canal of the Rhine, –the draining of the marshes of Burgoine, of the Cotentin, of Rochfort, –the rebuilding of the greater number of the churches destroyed during the Revolution, — the building of others, — the institution of numerous establishments of industry for the suppression of mendicity, — the building at the Louvre, — the construction of public warehouses, of the Bank, of the canal of the Ourcq, — the distribution of water in the city of Paris, — the numerous drains, the quays, the embellishments and the monuments of that large capital, –the works for the embellishment of Rome, –the re-establishment of the manufactures of Lyons, –the creation of many hundreds of manufactories of cotton, for spinning and for weaving, which employ several millions of workmen, — funds accumulated to establish upwards of 400 manufactories of sugar from beet-roots —all of these paid for, not with credibility money of the printing press and credit system, but with silver coins that have been earned first and spent afterwards”
    http://www.yamaguchy.com/library/lascases/lascases_index.html

    “France has tried both paper and gold, and the study of six years of her history –the study of it from 1799 to 1806– from the exclusive depreciated paper currency of the Republic to the exclusive specie currency of the Empire — will teach all nations the easy way to reform a ruined currency, and to recover the solid one, which is the only sure basis of public and private — of national and individual, prosperity. When Bonaparte became First Consul, in 1799, the currency of France was far worse than that of Michigan or Mississippi at this moment. Neither the Government, nor the people, had specie; nothing but assignats and mandats, wholly inconvertible and ruinously depreciated, yet, in six years, that great man had chased away paper, and brought in above five hundred millions of gold and silver; enough to revive industry, to sustain prices, to reward labor, to defray the expenses of wars and of the Imperial Court; to make roads, canals and docks, and to build a navy; enough, in a word, for the habitual currency of the forty millions of souls who constituted the population of the Empire.” —Senator Thomas benton, 1840.

    “None but the students of the history of these times can realize how much we owe to that “Corsican soldier” who understood England’s policy to the core, and who so valiantly made England and all Europe feel his power, and join for common protection, for a quarter of a century, and so occupied the attention of King George and his scheming subjects, that in some degree the operations which had been planned for our destruction were deferred, notably to our advantage.” —National Currency Party of California, 1877.

  5. If would be lenders lose confidence in a country’s debt, all that country has to do is print money and buy back the debt as it matures (assuming it issues its own currency). That way the country won’t pay an elevated interest rate. And as to any inflationary effect of the buy back (i.e. QE), taxes can be raised (and/or public spending cut). The latter gives a deflationary effect which cancels out any inflationary effect coming from QE.

  6. The money still exists, along with huge amounts that has been transferred out of the country because of our multi-decade trade imbalance. All of these excess dollars constitute a large reservoir that will flood the economy when the holders of these dollars decide to exchange them for something else – a process that has already begun.

  7. name789 – you should read an expose that you posted entitled “A Scientific Exposure of the Errors in Our Monetary System”

    Mary Hobart, 1891 — http://www.yamaguchy.com/library/uregina/hobart.html

    “Kind reader, before perusing this little work, you are earnestly requested to lay aside all prejudice and preconceived ideas, and examine the facts and demonstrations herein set forth in the spirit of a truth seeker.

    “The subject of money has for so many centuries been surrounded by complexities and superstitions, and shrouded in mystifications, purposely imposed upon the unthinking masses, that it would seem like egotism on the part of any ordinary mortal to attempt to clear the subject of its obscurities.

    “A reward has been offered for the purpose of giving prominence to a fact which is a disturbing element in our financial system, and which clearly accounts for the vast number of business failures which are taking place yearly throughout the United States. This mathematical law seems to have been unobserved by all our writers on finance, and it is to be hoped that this formula will unite all scientists in condemning the system of loaning money. This reward will also serve as a standing challenge to all those who oppose reform, and as long as it remains untaken it will be absolute proof that the demonstration is unanswerable, and if unanswerable it is scientific, and scientific truth will force reform.

    “If any criticism are to be made on this work, let them be made in the name of science and supported by logical and mathematical demonstration. Let not the mere say so of anyone stand for proof. If these pages aid any in reasoning upon an abstruse subject, or lift from the mind the veil of superstition, or lead any to see the great necessity for reform, it will have accomplished its mission.

    Chapter V. – Mathematical fallacy of interest

    “The great robber of all our financial prosperity is the legalized power of the dollar to draw interest. It is only legalized power because the dollar is a dead, inanimate piece of matter utterly destitute of the power of increase and when we give it the power to draw interest we give it the power to disturb our business, bankrupt our merchants, to foreclose our real estate and to rob labor of its just rewards. To substantiate these statements we need not at all resort to theory. There is an abundant mathematical proof. Whenever we operate with numbers we have mathematical law and the operations which we perform with numbers must conform to mathematical law and be susceptible of mathematical proof.

    “To make entirely sure that our reasoning upon the impossibility of paying interest when the principal is all loaned without the production or coining of money is logically and mathematically true, we will apply to our problem the test of higher mathematics. In examining the credit system we find that it must be composed of a definite number of interest-bearing contracts. By analyzing one of these contracts we shall find two parties are concerned in them, the borrower and the loaner. The loaner loans a stipulated sum of money called the principal; the borrower receives it and agrees to return a like sum together with a premium called the interest, which is estimated at a legal rate per cent on the sum loaned for a given time. Failure of the borrower to comply with these conditions calls for the forfeiture of his securities. This comprises all the quantities and considerations of an interest-bearing contract. It may be algebraically expressed thus :

    Let a==the amount of a contract (which is the sum of the principal and interest).
    p==the principal.
    r==the rate per cent.
    t==the time

    “Now p==a at the date the contract is drawn, and p+prt/100==a at the time the contract expires. Quantities that are equal to like quantities are equal to each other. Hence p==p+prt/100 which is impossible

    “This formula shows that the contract is impossible, that prt/100 calls for a production of money and cannot be canceled by a production of values. Neither can it be eliminated by a contraction of t, which constantly increases pr/100. This being true of one contract it must be true of any number of contracts with the credit system may contain. This formula solves one of the important problems of the age and is presented to the scientific people of America for inspection. A reward of $500 will be given to the first person who demonstrates this formula to be mathematically false.

    _________________________________________________

    name789 & others, if you can refute Mary Hobart’s mathematical logic, a reward of $500 was offered. Had you been able to do so, back in 1891 when the book was first published, and had you deposited the $500 to collect 7% interest, and allowed the interest to be re-invested (compounding) you would now have around:

    $ 2,494,992 !!!!!

    Such is the power of usury – exponential growth in a finite world

    Larry

    • the american people are the dullest dullards –said Mary Hobart in 1891

      Instead of making global warming computer models (and straw men) you should pay yourself (and Eastman and Migchels) to smell some facts, and work with those. Just as real life temperature measurements ruin the illusion about SUVs and melting ice, the fact that debts have been paid off throws a monkey wrench into your construction.

      Please explain real life experiences, and make models and equations about them. (as I told you before) don’t expect me do the thinking for you, always.

      Ms. Hobart presents this picture that you cannot pay off debt by continually issuing debt certificates; this is only surprise to a groupie like yourself;
      What Ms. Hobart calls the mathematical fallacy of interest is not the fallacy of interest, it is the fallacy of the credit system, the fallacy of trying to pay debt with debt

      [as you know, the credit system is the pet idea of your friend, Migchels; send him $500.00 for no reason]

      the civil war debt was not not paid off because of the impossibility to pay 100+10% when the number of units is only 100, but because they kept on borrowing; principle and interest could have been paid off comfortably in 20 years or less, while at the same time the number of currency units could have been reduced and population increased (how would reduction of currency units and reduction of per capita circulation and paying principle and interest figure into your P&P equation ?)

      The example from 1835 demonstrates that it is very possible to pay off principle and interest even under gold/silver standard (please make a P&P equation of that, too)

      • Ultimately, all money is fiat — gold, silver, paper, sea shells…whatever. Credit is only debt based when interest is added; the attempt to pay back interest with only principle leads to the unending cycle of paying debt with more debt (loans) that you describe with your bogus fallacy.

        Otherwise, interest free credit is the means by which principle, in the form of goods, labor, and services, are transacted in a mutually discharging fashion — without ensuing and mounting debt.

        The national debt was not an example of how P + I could be paid off with P(gold/silver) + t(ime) as you state. It was simply a matter of having an massive external credit infusion. Simply put, Andrew Jackson paid off the national debt with tarriffs, taxes, selling public lands in the western U.S.,and by draconian spending cuts in the budget. Sorry, no special specie alchemy involved.

      • name789 wrote: the civil war debt was not not paid off because of the impossibility to pay 100+10% when the number of units is only 100, but because they kept on borrowing; principle and interest could have been paid off comfortably in 20 years or less

        Yes, the U.S. could have stopped borrowing and yes; they could have repaid the debt (both principal and interest). The interest could have been repaid by taking the money out of the national economy through taxes and levies.

        The national economy (the people’s labor and productive use of available resources) would foot the burden but remember; all of their money, too, is created as interest bearing debt. From where do they capture the added amount needed to repay P+I (Principal + Interest)? Plus they must capture the government’s P+I.

        We can rationalize scenarios in which P+I may be repaid but all of them include the expectation and hope that those who create the money will provide us the means to pay the Interest. For example, we could work directly for the money creators and use some of that pay to repay them. Or we could collectively repay it through taxes and other forms of what is effectively a “tribute.” Debt slavery.

        The interest shortfall can also be repaid through the transfer of collateral. Defaults are an integral part of the system in this pyramid scheme. The creators of money (a privilege that should rest solely with the people) are mathematically assured to continuously seize collateral.

        It’s theoretically possible for a national economy to run a trade surplus (more exports than imports) which could capture enough from foreign economies to repay the debt. This cannot be sustained however, as the interest compounds (interest charged on interest). The trade surplus would have to grow every year at an ever accelerating rate.

        There is another factor that needs mentioned. All money is temporary in a debt based monetary system – at best a zero sum game (the addition of interest makes it LESS than a zero sum game). All money created by debt is eventually destroyed as that debt (principal) is repaid (principal = money). If for some reason; both government and the private sector stop borrowing, then the money supply will begin to disappear. A depression is usually defined as a reduction in the money supply.

        In order to extend the pyramid scheme, the federal government never repays its debt. We maintain a national debt (U.S. currently $17 trillion) in order to maintain a money supply. We rent our circulation as a cruel tax and unescicary parasitic load. The growth of the national debt has been accelerating (geometric growth) – it took over 100 years for the national debt to reach $8 trillion and then it doubled during the past 8 years.

        The interest debt money system is a pyramid scheme – it is a systemic not user behavioral problem. And it is a problem of choice not necessity as it is easily remedied.

        Larry

        • >>>>> The interest could have been re-paid by taking the money out of the national economy through taxes and levies.
          (a) this is how you pay a national debt, through taxes (what is the big surprise here?)
          (b) it is not taking money out of the economy, it is paying your debt after you borrowed a bunch of money; by paying off the debt, money is not extinguished (the bonds are burned, not the coins); after the debt is re-paid, taxes and duties are eliminated, and coins remain with the people

          After the debt was extinguished in 1835, the promoters of competing currencies and unpayable debt prevented the reduction of duties (thereby the federal revenue) to a normal level (~10%), which caused problems

          http://www.yamaguchy.com
          the source of your finagled wisdom

    • >>>name789 – you should read an expose that you posted entitled …..
      As you well know, I produced those electronic texts from printed copies (you may thank me later), so I had read them more than once

      http://www.yamaguchy.com
      the source of your finagled wisdom

    • How do you repay 11 tokens when only 10 are created?

      Larry the goldite, who has never been inside a library, who recommends oh-so-highly worthless paper for others, but hoards silver; the bank-book hero and credit card warrior who opposes banks so much that he opened an account with them

      The fact is that under willing administrations and under the care of the managers of the sinking fund, the debt (priciple & interest) was discharged. Luckily these people did not know about the Plug&Play impossibility equation.

      Following the defeat of the armies of the credit system, paper money, competing & alternative currencies and unpayable debt, the government of the United States stopped borrowing and proceeded to discharge the debt; the people went to work, produced wealth, and from that wealth they paid duties on imports, they paid for lands; and in 1835 the debt was paid off.

      These are facts, please adjust your P&P computer model of impossibility

      ==========
      Having been cut off from the federal government, the promoters of the credit system, unpayable debt and competing currencies went to work on the State governments; and between 1836 and 1840 took out more than $100million for banking and internal improvements.

       

      On July 11, 1836, Secretary of the Treasury, Levy Woodbury, sent a letter to land offices and ordered them to receive in payment nothing but gold and silver, and occasionally, Virginia land scrip; and to sell land only to settlers who will work the land, and not to speculators. The hoot and howler of the advocates of worthless paper and competing currencies went up to the lower atmosphere, to repeal this outrage of tyranny; Senators Henry Clay, Daniel Webster, Thomas Ewing &co. –great friends of the people, domestic industry, internal improvements, and the American System– unleashed their eloquency and oratory on behalf of competing currencies:–

      “Mr. President, I am indifferent to the form in which the Treasury order may be done away. Gentlemen may please themselves in the mode. I shall be satisfied with the substance. Believing it both illegal and injurious, I shall vote to rescind, to revoke, to abolish, to supersede, to do anything which may have the effect of terminating its existence.”

      —said Daniel Webster, bosom friend of Baring & brothers, and the originator of many of our Migchels’ finagled ideas

       

      In 1837 the proposal for the Independent Treasury was introduced in Congress, to exclude banks, worthless paper and competing currencies from the financial affairs of the Federal government; and to limit the amount of competing currencies in circulation, and to start the long road towards financial normalsy. The debate in the houses of congress, in the newspapers of America, in the households of America, lasted 3 years. The usual procators of unpayable debt, permanent debt, worthless paper and competing currencies came out with two guns blazing. Migchels’ secret source of inspiration, Daniel Webster, is an example:

      Mr. President, such is the state of things actually existing in the country, and of which I have now given you a sample. And yet there are persons who constantly clamor against this state of things. They call it aristocracy. They beseech the poor to make war upon the rich, while, in truth, they know not who are either rich or poor. They complain of oppression, speculation, and the pernicious influence of accumulated wealth. They cry out loudly against all banks and corporations, and all the means by which small capitals become united, in order to produce important and beneficial results. They carry on a mad hostility against all established institutions. They would choke up the fountains of industry, and dry all its streams. In a country of unbounded liberty, they clamor against oppression. In a country of perfect equality, they would move heaven and earth against privilege and monopoly. In a country where property is more equally divided than anywhere else, they rend the air with the shouting of agrarian doctrines. In a country where the wages of labor are high beyond all paralell, and where lands are cheap, and the means of living low, they would teach laborer that he is but an oppressed slave.

      Sir, what can such men want ? What do they mean ? They can want nothing, sir, but to enjoy the fruits of other men’s labor. They can mean nothing, but disturbance and disorder; the diffusion of corrupt principles, and the destruction of the moral sentiments and moral habits of society. A licentiousness of feeling and of action is sometimes produced by prosperity itself. Men cannot always resist the temptation to which they are exposed by the very abundance of the bounties of Providence and the very happiness of their own condition; as the steed, full of the pasture, will, sometimes, throw himself against its enclosures, break away from its confinement, and, feeling now free needless restraint, betake himself to the moors and barrens, where want, ere long, brings him to his senses, and starvation and death close his career.

      —Some decades later, this piece of honesty will be called Freudian Slip; Mr. Webster reveals his true feelings towards these agrarians, he considers them live-stock in great need of a rancher, too dumb to know what is good for them; just as Migchels and his mentor, Ellen Brown, thinks that people –who do not know about the Plug&Play equation of impossibility– are in great need of a commune
       

      Not to be left out of the fray, and to show where his allegiance lies, on December 26, 1839, in the mids of the Independent Treasury agitation, scum-bucket Lincoln, future dictator, blood-thirsty maniac and psycho-killer of the United States, had the audacity to open his vile face and with forked tongue deliver a speech against the Independent Treasury concept; because Honest Abe was a Whig: a being who hates independence and aims to turn the country into a fiefdom, mortgaged to internationalist bankers. The banker’s mouth-piece openly recommended: the establishment of the credit system; the gifting of the credit of the government to bankers; the circulation of worthless paper and competing currencies; the institution of an unpayable national debt
       

      Following Martin Van Buren’s departure from New York to take the office of Presidency, future police minister, William Seward, became Governor of New York, and in 1838 free banking was introduced in that State, and the permanent-debt-based competing currency of the credit system was unleashed. Two decades later Lincoln and his crew fastened onto the whole United States this free banking credit system and unpayable debt; 150 years later this debt is still with us –Mr. Lincoln &co. obviously knew about the Plug&Play equation of impossibility long before Migchels or Larry the leech came on the scene

      • If you have a problem with Mary Hobart’s brilliant:

        “A Scientific Exposure of the Errors in Our Monetary System”
        Chapter V. – Mathematical fallacy of interest
        Mary Hobart, 1891 — http://www.yamaguchy.com/library/uregina/hobart.html

        You provide some quotes that have nothing to do with her premise (interest-debt cannot be fully repaid – its a pyramid scheme). She makes a mathematical statement in proving her thesis and if its wrong, show us the corrective math.

        Mary Hobart – If any criticism are to be made on this work, let them be made in the name of science and supported by logical and mathematical demonstration. Let not the mere say so of anyone stand for proof.

        • >>>>> How do you repay 11 tokens when only 10 are created?
          As Republicae pointed out, the sum total of your brain capacity is to copy and paste.

          Mary Hobart is dead –how is it that your charlatan heroes Brown and Still, did not tell you about Hobart ? how is it that on your own you never came across Mary Hobarts books ? how is it that you have to rely on me ?–

          Please answer your own question, because contrary to your computer model the debt was paid off

        • >>>> You provide some quotes that have nothing to do with her
          Those quotes indicate the source of the brain-fucked ideas of ‘monetary reformist’ groupies (competing currency, credit currency, alternative currency)

    • Jeepers Larry, more plagiarists of Mike M?

      • No Anthony, Mary never offers any proposed solution throughout her essay. Just merely exposing the mathematical impossibility to maintain a vital circulation wihtout running into insoluble debt.

        • Still, quite a feat, 130 years ago. The Populists were very, very knowledgeable at the time.

  8. From the 31st December, 1789, to the 31st December, 1835, the United States paid for
    interest on the public debt the sum of $157,629,950.69;
    and for the principal the sum of $257,452,083.24;
    together making the sum of $415,082,033.93.

    All in coin.
    Prior to the Nevada and California discoveries, there may have been 100,000,000 coin in the United States………
    During these 35 years how much personal debt (principal and interest), how much business debt (principal and interest) was also paid off ?……
    On January 1st 1830, the population of the United States was 12,866,020…….

    • We rent the money that we use from a private group of bankers who have no money of their own.

      The alternative to create our own money for free, like the banks do, and circulate amongst ourselves – free from rent!

      If that is not illogical enough; here’s the clincher:

      We rent the money that we pay in rent – interest on interest in a giant pyramid scheme.

    • So, was it ‘loop’, was it ‘velocity’, or what was it that paid off $257million in principal and 60% in interest ?

      • Quite right name. The intrinsic instability of the system is a useful argument, but the problem is the 60% they payed in interest.

        • >>>>but the problem is
          The problem is that –unlike your theory (drug-induced or not)– in this real life example principal and interest were paid off; out of 100million coin supply 170million interest was paid; all it took were presidents Madison, JQ Adams, Andrew Jackson, and a Congress

          • sorry, not Madison, Monroe

          • are you absolutely sure no new credit was added to the money supply while paying back the original P?

            • The only thing that is certain is the principal and interest, the number of coins in the realm is only estimate; the amount of new wealth(not credit) could be estimated; the number of bank-notes is unknown.

              But it would be a good place to start crunching numbers, and demonstrating what and how happened (a lot better place than some theory based on hot air). Has the Treasury always paid in coin ? how often(and what amount) has it used notes of its fiscal agent, the Bank of the United States ?

              =======
              we also know that the 2,700million civil war obligation could have been (easily) paid off, with 7% interest, and the greenbacks redeemed (on demand) in gold, without adding to the money supply (in fact, the reduction of currency, by eliminating 270million bank notes, would have helped the process)
              and we have much, much better numbers from 1865 than 1835 (number of government notes, bonds, bank-notes, business and personal debt, business output, asset value of the country)

              The answer to your question seems to be ‘Yes’ it is very possible to pay off $100.00+10% if the number of coins is 100

              >>>>For the longest time we have been maintaining that the principal is created, but not the interest and thus eternal indebtedness is part of the system.
              We already discussed it in another topic that if LarryX wants to purchase a $1,000.00 automobile, but does not want to pay for it until 12months later, he simply has to work 10% more (so interest is also created); within 1 year he can easily do that. (you may ask: is LarryX renting the money or the car?)
              similarly: a society, too, can do what LarryX did

              the impossibility (and im-morality) occurs when the principal and interest is a larger number than work-hours in the life-time of 100million people
              when we try to pay for present wants from future means

              (yes virginia, the principal is just as much a problem as the interest)

              • At what point is fraud justified, by your logic? When it is possible to pay it back in full, of course! (as if this were ever a real world conditionality) How could it be moral to lend something you don’t have (principle created ex nihlo) AND demand unearned rents (interest) for its use? Money is not wealth, like your automobile, but a mere conduit for it. Hence, it is only principle (commensurate with the value of the automobile) that should ever be repaid — morally speaking.

                I think you have more in common with Paulson than a baldly head.

            • “The national income out of which that extraordinary sum of four hundred and fifteen millions of dollars was paid, over and above the ordinary annual expenditures, (which, during that period of forty-six years, exceeded five hundred millions of dollars,) was derived principally from the duties on imports and tonnage, and the sales of the public lands. Direct taxes and intemal duties and excises were employed from and after the 8th day of May, 1792, until the 30th June, 1802, when they were repealed; and again enacted in the year 1813, and repealed 31st December, 1817. A system of direct taxes and internal duties has been resorted to only in emergencies, and has prevailed only for about fifteen years of the fifty-five which have elapsed since the Federal Constitution was adopted.

              “The moral power, courage, and capabilities by which a nation in its infancy, loaded with a debt of the revolutionary war of such magnitude, harassed by Indian wars, and encumbered by another debt of the war of 1812, terminated in 1815, discharged those debts faithfully — exhibiting to a gazing and astonished world the example of a nation which had exerted such energies, of a Government without a national debt, with an overflowing Treasury, and without direct taxes, internal duties, and excises — are to be looked for in the genius of the Government, the integrity of those who have been elected to administer it, the good sense, honesty, and enterprise of the citizens, and lastly, though not least, in the beneficent smiles of an all-wise and protecting Providence.”

              • Really? Then how do you explain this http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/histdebt/histdebt_histo1.htm ? There seems to be no interuption in the accumulation in national debt during the periods you describe.

                • >>>Then how do you explain this
                  I explain this by your in-ability to comprehend what you read. You might be a victim of public education.

                  the link you gave states—
                  Grand total of federal debt on January 1st 1835: ……. $33,733.05
                  Grand total of federal debt on Januray 1st 1836: ……. $37,513.05

                  Anyone else, other than you, this means that the federal debt was paid off.

                  • btw, there is nothing in the data alone which suggests that the national debt was paid off. I knew this from other sources. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_United_States_public_debt Most of the data set have this pattern.

                    Was the national debt paid off in 1791, 1799 , ect. ? Even public school kids know better.

                    01/01/1791 75,463,476.52
                    01/01/1792 77,227,924.66

                    01/01/1799 78,408,669.77
                    01/01/1800 82,976,294.35

                • my bad, 1835 wasn’t the date(s) i thought you quoted.

            • The United States have purchased all the lands they hold. They have paid the money, and a great price in money for them. No gifts, no donations, no gratuitous cessions of lands have been made to this Government; but with money from her Treasury has she bought and paid for the whole—

              Purchase of Louisiana …..$15,000,000
              Interest paid thereon ……8,329,353
              Purchase of Florida …..5,000,000
              Interest thereon ……1,480,000
              Paid to Georgia ……1,250,000
              Same purchase in Mississippi stock …….1,832,000
              Extinguishing Indian titles ……72,000,000
              Survey of public lands …….3,250,000
              Salaries and expenditures in the General Land Office …….1,250,000
              Land offices and officers ……3,300,000
              ………………………….$112,691,353

    • Source?

      This country has always been in some form of recievership to the private banks since the revolutionary war — except for the Lincoln Administation. FDR’s House Joint Resolution 192 has us in this state today by taking all of our gold (coin) and replacing it with an unrepayable debt and a hypothecated fiat currency.

  9. Economic Growth is killing our planet, making our products “cradle-to-cradle” and focussing on renewable, clean energy for the world is impossible because of our current system.

    Get rid of interest alltogether, it must become illegal to ask ànd offer interest, worldwide. This will put banks out of business, or they will specialize in real trading and stockmarkets. No more loans, mortgages and savings. This will be taken care of by Interestfree state banks (without meddling from politics!) They will have a saving-secton (money not to be touched, no interest, no trading, no growth), and an interest-free credit and mortgage section. The few people employed there (everything is digitalised) will be working for us all, the people, and will get a normal salary like any civil servant, paid for by “the people” through taxes. There will no longer be a profit in lending money, or in keeping it out of circulation longer by saving at high interest rates. The state banks will provide loans for houses or businesses based on feasability, solvency, and desirability.

    The money that’s created from scratch (at first) gets its economic value when it’s paid off, and will be recycled for new loans. For this to work, the whole world would have to adapt this system. It will ensure the possibility for either socialism OR a free market system to really work, or to have a nice mixture of the two. It should create the possibility for a great deal of freedom for inventive entrepreneurs, while making sure the ones who need more help, can receive it, without some bank trying to suck the life out of them, and out of the real economy.

    My explanation about this utopian “Mononomy” can be read in Dutch (I still haven;t translated it yet) on my blog (“Mononomie”) or maybe you can paste in in Google Translate to get an idea ;-) The best part is: There is no need for countries to be poor anymore, with this ONE world currency, there’s also no more trading of “stronger currencies”, no more need for loans from the richer countries, making them poorer and poorer, while more dependant on thèm. These countries can create exactly the amount of MONO needed for their country to develop and thrive, based on great ideas to make their land furtile, their energy green and renewable, their water supply enough to feed everyone, while hiring the best people and machines they may need, from all over the world. The mono that is invested in such enterprises will slowly come back to their own Monobank, where it will be used again, if needed, feasable, and necessary.

    Life will be so simple, economists won’t know what to do with themselves ;-) But no worries: Work will become something we do because we like it, no longer because we HAVE to, to survive :)

  10. Dark Dirk: That is my favorite Margrit Kennedy’s movie: “Are we so regimented that we cannot grasp concepts like “handling fees” and “service charges” in lieu of interest?”
    Jct: Thanks Dark Dirk, I hadn’t noticed. It’s now my favorite Margrit Kennedy quote too. Back in the early 1980s, I asked the Supreme Court of Canada 5 times to restrict the banks computers to a pure service charge and abolish the interest charge.” Nice to see someone so noteworthy also put it so simply. “Are we so regimented that we cannot grasp concepts like “handling fees” and “service charges” in lieu of interest?” Those judges certainly were so regimented. But the billion-plus souls whom they could have saved but croaked due to their inaction have formed a gauntlet the banksters will have to run trying to get into Heaven! Har har har. They could have saved a billion souls over the past 30-years and said no!

  11. This is incorrect. In the above example, there is already 100 P in existence. It appears to be non-interest-bearing, because the holder of P — the one who loans the money– does not owe P+I to a bank. The holder of P does not create new money and issue it out as debt plus interest.

    In our system, there is more debt than money. In the example above, there is 100 dollars of money and no debt; And at no time is new money is created.

    The premise is inaccurate and, possibly, deceitful. The above scenario describes a system wherein there is free, honest money.

    MMT people try to play the same sort of trick with respect to the purchase of treasuries bought by the fed. Because interest on the fed treasury holdings makes it way back to the treasury, the MMT people say it’s not important. However, they dismiss the fact that the Fed issues less money than debt to the treasury, so that the treasury must get the difference from the private sector, who must get it from demanding loans from banks, which belong to the fed!

    • This is incorrect. In the above example, there is already 100 P in existence.
      Jct: No, no one on the island has any money when we start our example. We’re starting up a new banking system is the premise, not that someone was born with the original $100 P. Besides, why would we call it P if it isn’t the Principal of the Loan yet? P represents Principal in the equation. Get it, it represents the loan of new chips. P is not how much old money was around. And so, if the premise is off-target, I’ll leave the rest of the analysis to miss too.

      • I see. And the money isn’t destroyed as it is in the current system?

        • Jct: Gee, you got that basic premise wrong too. No, the chips are retired from circulation (if not destroyed) when cashed out just like chips are put into circulation (not created right then) when bought in for. What is it about poker chips that you find so difficult to grasp?

  12. REN permalink

    Anthony, there was a good proof at BIBOcurrency.com showing interest driven instability, but I cannot find it. Positive interest adds costs at every chain of production. This added cost is refinanced again and again by both manufacturing and consumers; this chain of borrowing causes the original positive interest to compound. Anytime usury is rolled over by compounding, it becomes exponential (unbounded) and hence not payable.

    The usury can be paid when debt contracts are cancelled with asset grabbing. (Assets are not money. Usually housing is on the ledger…about 70% of all loans.) Any former BM in circulation now is set free by bankruptcy law. Those former BM dollars, which had a force vector compelling return to the ledger, are now free to float. Their liability association has been erased. This new debt free money is now also free to pay usury; financiers have gone through their grabbing phase canceling debt contracts, and hence the system goes back to temporary equilibrium. A new debt cycle may now begin anew.

    Gold is no better, because by its nature, it is positive interest. Gold’s fixed volume cannot match the exponential of usury and hence paper or electronic digits must be “created” to make it a workable system. The created paper digits will pretend gold convertibility, and during inevitable depressions real gold will be confiscated as an “asset”, concentrating said Gold into financier hands.

    So, between BM principle destruction, usury exponential compounding, and the upper loop financial economy(concentrations of stagnant usury capital), there is no way the Austrian scenario can ever work.

    I’m glad you hold your nose and debate the Austrians, though it must be frustrating!

    • Thanks REN, we agree, of course.

      The only thing frustrating about debating the Austrians is knowing the non-initiated are easily fooled by their antics. And also that they and the mainstream media control the flow of information, so their silly nonsense is so overexposed compared to rational thought.

      But with a clear grasp of the issues it is actually often very funny. I’ve always seen the bright side of stupidity in the sense that it’s an endless source of smiles and even outright joy and laughter.

      • I don’t know, I mean Jews and their brainwashed cattle say some pretty humorous things once you can see through to the core, and it’s amusing to a point, but when you realize that the end result of all this will be a global slave world where all who resist Jewish domination shall be tortured and murdered, and only a mongrel slave race that does not resist shall remain, with a few whites and other resistors kept around for various forms of torture including ritual crucifixion and rape, followed by the inevitable destruction of the remnants of the human race as Jews turn on each other once they’ve defeated all those who resist them, it’s hard to have “outright joy and laughter” about it, especially considering so few are willing to hear the facts, and we are pretty much alone in this knowledge.

        Perhaps you have faith that we will be victorious merely by following the word of Christ and exposing the truth, but I’m afraid that isn’t enough for me.

        • I know, it’s basically a wicked sense of humor, and I think I don’t have to explain I take the whole issue rather…….seriously.

          I indeed have all the faith in the world that following the Word will not only lead to victory, but is the only viable strategy to victory.

  13. adam ahmad permalink

    Hi Anthony.
    actually paul grignon (money as debt documentary) also mention about this issue. He states that we can pay the interest if money (principal) is spent. But then he concludes that the problem is not only because of unspent money but also the creation of money as debt itself.
    http://paulgrignon.netfirms.com/MoneyasDebt/Analysis_of_Banking.html

  14. How do you repay 11 tokens when only 10 are created?
    And don’t forget as the 10 tokens (principal) are repaid, the money is destroyed – it ceases to exist.

    You hope other tokens will be created so that you have the opportunity to capture the 11th. Of course, other tokens will be created (as interest bearing debt) and more and more and so on and so on. But the basic problem remains – debts can only be fully repaid (P+I) when other debts (P) come into circulation. Plato explained this problem as money, unlike rabbits or cattle, does not reproduce and we cannot repay more than we borrow.

    Empirical evidence – Dr. Chris Martenson wrote a great article entitled “Death by Debt” in which he explained the following chart:

    http://media.peakprosperity.com/images/credit-market-doublings.jpg

    “There’s a lot going on in this deceptively simple chart so let’s take it one step at a time. First, “Total Credit Market Debt” is everything – financial sector debt, government debt (federal, state, and local), household debt, and corporate debt – and that is the bold red line (data from the Federal Reserve). Next, if we start in January 1970 and ask the question, “How long before that debt doubled and then doubled again?” we find that debt has doubled five times in four decades (blue triangles).

    “Then if we perform an exponential curve fit (blue line) and round up, we find a nearly perfect fit with a R2 of 0.99. This means that debt has been growing in a nearly perfect exponential fashion through the 1970′s, the 1980′s, the 1990′s and the 2000′s. In order for the 2010 decade to mirror, match, or in any way resemble the prior four decades, credit market debt will need to double again, from $52 trillion to $104 trillion.

    “Finally, note that the most serious departure between the idealized exponential curve fit and the data occurred beginning in 2008, and it has not yet even remotely begun to return to its former rajectory.

    “This explains everything.” — http://www.peakprosperity.com/blog/death-debt/58941

    To repay the debts requires exponential growth which cannot be sustained in a finite world. Defaults are an integral part of such a monetary system. Dr. Martenson on the problem with exponential growth: “We found an identical pattern in our debt, total credit market, and money supply that guarantees they’re going to fail. This pattern is nearly the same as in any pyramid scheme, one that escalates exponentially fast before it collapses.”

    A “pyramid scheme” sums it up quite nicely. Margrit Kennedy explains the interest- debt money system in the following video (she begins at around 2:20):

    I think there are two great failures with many monetary reformers. First, many do not understand the terminal problems associated with interest.

    The second failure is in not being able to offer alternatives to the charging of interest. Are we so regimented that we cannot grasp concepts like “handling fees” and “service charges” in lieu of interest?

    • Hi Larry,

      As you know I’m aiming at a completely usury free economy and never settle for less. I also agree, I work that out in detail in the article, that in practice the debt can never be repaid. For reasons that the P + I > P equation hints at, but does not prove, as I showed.

      If the interest is not spent into circulation, no matter what the velocity, the debt can never be paid. Even if the interest IS spent back into circulation, the debt cannot be paid with current M2 velocity.

      However, IF velocity is sufficient and the interest is immediately spent back into circulation, the debt can be repaid. But, as I showed, these are two big ifs that simply don’t stand.

      It’s really very important to get the complete picture. Our friends of the Austrian persuasion (see here for instance: http://www.tomwoods.com/paper/) have managed to subvert the argument in the most optimal situation (scenario C of the article). Scenario C does not exist in practice, but it does in theory.

      This is damaging the credibility of Interest-Free economics.

      Not only that: most of what I’ve learned about money is by listening very carefully to what everybody (and I mean everybody) has to say. Our biggest opponents are our best teachers. This is just another case in point.

      I’d invite you to have a closer look at the three scenarios I work out in the article and see if you can find a fault in it, not because I want to be right, but because I want to get it right.

      Thanks, it’s great having you at Real Currencies sharing your knowledge!
      Anthony

      • Hello Anthony,

        Thanks for your response. You raise some interesting points in asking “Is there enough money to pay off debt plus interest?”

        Coming from you, a champion against usury; I think we have to explore the various assertions as there is not anywhere near a consensus or some mathematical proof that is obvious to all. Is the interest debt money system economy a pyramid scheme – mathematical suicide?

        Here are several observations to hopefully further your discussion:

        1 How can the debt be repaid?

        We’ve all read the explanations as to how Principal + Interest may be repaid in full. Examples:

        The bank spends the interest back into the economy – the bank spends 100% of the interest back into the economy and those needing to pay interest, capture all of that that money – proportionately.

        Or, those that owe interest, work for the bank and receive the interest as pay.

        In these scenarios the banks are obviously in total control – inescapable? We rely on their benevolence?

        2 Can the velocity of money (times money is re-spent in a year) be great enough to satisfy the interest requirement?

        We place two demands on the required amount of “new money” that must be created at regular time intervals. Unfortunately, the demand ever accelerates for two reasons. First, money is destroyed everyday as people repay principal on loans to banks. New money must be created at an equal rate to prevent the money supply from shrinking. The economy MUST grow and in the U.S.; the Federal Reserve suggests the rate of growth should be at around 2%/year.

        Second, interest payments must be quickly re-spent into the economy where they may be captured by those in need. I think you make a good point in your article that constantly increasing the velocity of money cannot be sustained.

        3 Static or dynamic analysis?

        We have been discussing single tier interest charges whereby people borrow from banks and must repay that amount. In actuality, interest is charged on interest through multiple transactions in the economy. I think that interest charged on interest is by definition – compounding (exponential/ quadratic growth?).

        For example, a manufacturer may pay interest in financing their operations and a wholesaler may pay interest in financing their marketing operations. A retailer may pay interest on inventory and warehousing. Is it safe to say that compounding is unavoidable thus unsustainable; in an interest based economy? (See Margrit Kennedy for detailed analysis)

        4 What about the exponential growth of interest collected on bonds, etc?

        If one is in the position to continuously roll over bonds (principal + interest) or re-invests interest proceeds; the money will eventually grow exponentially. Can any economy long endure this growing parasitic load?

        I have no problem with people investing money in stocks but think that bonds were created so that many may be legally siphon from the productive economy. Bonds are simply that – bondage – there is no salient reason for government or individuals to ever pay interest. The borrower alone endows the new money with value through collateral and the “credit ability” to repay. Of course, handling and transaction fees are in order.

        Larry

        • Thanks Larry, great input.

          “In these scenarios the banks are obviously in total control – inescapable? We rely on their benevolence?”

          I couldn’t agree more. I intend to follow up on this because I believe it is very important to not be satisfied with one argument against usury, even very strong ones like the fact that the debt is unpayable (although not only because of P + I > P). We need exactly this kind of thinking as you mention here too: the power issue is very fundamental. It’s very important that people grow up and get rid of the ‘oh but they’re just guys, we can trust them with our lifeblood’ Stockholm Syndrome driven kind of attitude.

          The other issues you bring forward are certainly very much on target also.

          • btw, I also am very happy with the way you insist on the simple truth that the money system can easily and equitably be financed with the handling fees and service charges. So important to keep spelling out the very real alternatives.

    • Dark Dirk permalink

      That is my favorite Margrit Kennedy’s movie.

      “Are we so regimented that we cannot grasp concepts like “handling fees” and “service charges” in lieu of interest?”

      Unfortunately, yes. Many people, with who I have spoken, think that “handling fee” equals robbery. These are equally capitalists, who says that interest is the basic of economy, and socialists who says that I want to rob saving of the poor with that tax. Capitalist profits from interest, and socialist just do not understand the hidden redistribution system of interest.

      peakprosperity.com is one of my favorite websites also. I have encountered it before I have Learned about Silvio Gesell. The Chris Martenson’s Crash Course made me think about money, exponential growth and feature of humanity.

  15. REN permalink

    P > P + I But, what happens if P shrinks, as in the case with banker credit money, what I call BM? When P shrinks on both sides of the equation, all that is left is usury.

    Usury becomes more pronounced, because the velocity cycles are cut short. BM does not want to spin at high velocity because it implodes and destroys itself every month as the loan is paid down. Money that has disappeared cannot be spent.

    This is the key feature of 100% reserves. This money type doesn’t disappear, and will tend to stay in the supply allowing transactions to mediate at a lower usury take than BM. Of course, fully reserved money will effectively disappear by hoarding, and hence it needs some compelling force to move. Demurrage on floating money is an ideal to my mind.

    Consider that the financial economy has floating money, not under compunction to move, except for maybe inflation. Usury, once it is paid into the banking system, does not need to leave the system until the holder chooses to spend. In this way, usury money behaves a lot like Gold, waiting its time to buy assets from depressed goods and services providers of the real economy.

    The three borrowing sectors, Government/Household/Business are all under usury drain and principle destruction to endogenous BM banker money (M1,M2). To make the borrowing sectors come into balance, Keynes suggested governments borrow and spend, rolling over their public debts forever. This deficit spend money ultimately becomes savings of the household and business sector, as well as usury of the banking financial sector.

    Lately, the financial class has allowed a lot of M0 (floating base money) to come into being, especially with quantitative easing. If we think of financial class usury being floating without having compelling forces acting on it, and we also look at base money, they are the same.

    Looking at Mortgage Backed Securities, for example: They were created by tranching mortgages, with securities having high leverage ratios based on nothing. MBS were then sold to short term buyers, some of whom were banks. They went on to become reserves in the banking sector, and of course now we know the FED swapped cash for this trash. The financial class then gets a quality type of money at even higher rates that the equation above suggests.

    The financial class also multiplies their advantage due to the inherent drain bias designed into the system, as their floating money acts like gold.

  16. Gary S. permalink

    Despite having an MBA in finance–I’ve given-up on the number crunching. There’s an agenda which supersedes fundamental analysis. The link is a blog site by Clint Richardson. Clint and Walter Burien are experts on the CAFR report–a report that each US municipality reports to the Fed Gov’t. While California discussed a $16 billion budget shortfall in 2012–the state’s publicly available CAFR report posted $533 billion in liquid investments, alone. the game is rigged brother and now [Canada, New Zealand, England, Russia, US, etc.] are going after depositors [bail in]–redefining them [double speak] as “unsecured creditors”. Will the sheeple take it???

    http://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2012/05/25/california-government-hides-billions-from-taxpayers/

    • REN permalink

      The agenda currently is maintenance of the double entry ledger, and its ability to hypothecate money into being: Prior to double entry ledger emergence on the world scene (Venice?), was other machinery of falsification, such as Gold with bank notes riding on top. Today, private bank’s network with each other, so their bank credit money can find its way home, returning to individual ledgers. What emitted from the ledger must return to the ledger. This is not something that is taught in economic textbooks, and as far as I know, I’m the only one speaking on this subject. But, ledger mechanics are critical to understand why we have a financial upper loop, which holds capital usury pools, formerly base money.

      Banker credit (BM) is something like Salmon returning home to their birthing/breeding grounds. The ultimate network of course, is one big World Bank. The fiction of double entry bookkeeping has as its root function a legal mechanism, such that any BM issued forth, must return to that same ledger. All BM must swim in the money supply and return to THAT singular ledger. Networking and consolidation of banks is then a prime directive output function of double entry design. Base money as issued by Government, becomes banker reserves, and helps to intermediate imbalances in the bank system, while BM returns to the ledger to balance books, and then disappear.

      BM from a single bank travels in a closed loop like a train closed in on its own rail system. But, BM can jump tracks when banks network, making it more “universally acceptable.” When government sanctions BM as acceptable for taxes, it has added more tracks that “switch” and allow BM to loop further afield. In this way, the banker’s “ticket” to ride the train, gains currency. This desire to own the falsification machinery repeats itself through history:

      According to Dr. Henry Makow, Hitler had to be stopped; he had sidestepped the international bankers and created his own money. Makow quotes from the 1938 interrogation of C. G. Rakovsky, one of the founders of Soviet Bolsevism and a Trotsky intimate, who was tried in show trials in the USSR under Stalin. According to Rakovsky, Hitler had actually been funded by the international bankers, through their agent Hjalmar Schacht, in order to control Stalin, who had usurped power from their agent Trotsky. But Hitler had become an even bigger threat than Stalin when he had taken the bold step of printing his own money. Rakovsky said:

      [Hitler] took over for himself the privilege of manufacturing money and not only physical moneys, but also financial ones; he took over the untouched machinery of falsification [This is my point – the falsification is the double entry ledger, or other mechanics, such as Gold base with paper debt receipts] and put it to work for the benefit of the state . . . . Are you capable of imagining what would have come . . . if it had infected a number of other states . . . . If you can, then imagine its counterrevolutionary functions.

      Mutual credit is honest money, where the tracks circulate among the ticket holders of its system. Honest system design is such that there are no hidden wealth transfer mechanisms. Mutual type banking, such as that advocated by Bagehot, Kitson, and Name, divides up wealth (of altruistic wealth holders) and issues correlated tokens to float in the supply – to the benefit of the public. In this way, the double entry ledger mechanism is thwarted, yet the ticket is a form of credit based on wealth. My personal view is that a sovereign people should own their money power, and government should tax and recycle monies received from the people. This money is issued and controlled scientifically. It is long past the time that humanity should be held hostage to usury mechanism and falsification techniques owned by pride defective individuals.

      Yes, we can pay off our current private debts (in the real economy) by simply issuing debt free greenbacks. But, that thwarts the falsification machinery.

  17. Jct: I’ll see if I can a video at http://vonvo.com this weekend with a critique of the errors in this analysis. My fingers are tired of typing. Maybe you’d like to participate and defend your analysis?

    • No offense meant to my friend Anthony but… Kudos John!

      I would very much enjoy an engineer as elegant as you explaining the mortgage “death gamble.”

  18. The only conceivable way that money could move fast enough to repay compound interest imho would be if the money powers allowed free energy tech to be realsed for public global use…. fat chance.

    Otherwise its back to the repayment in the faux sense. The unreapayable portion generated by interest just gets rolledover into a larger loan in the next fiscal budget, ad infinitum. The truth to this no win dilemma is that to actually pay off the debt would just make things worse. Our money supply would simply disappear.

  19. Dark Dirk permalink

    Great article. I think it is correct. I also think that money in real economy circulate fast. I receive my salary and spend it over the month. In financial economy money just sits on accounts. And people in financial economy need big quantities of money in their accounts, because they live on interest. They do not produce something real to offer on market. The only thing that they can offer is money, and they want to profit from this. And other people allows them, gets loans from them and pays them interest.

  20. Hi. I tried reading this but, unfortunately, the way it is laid out, the right hand side of the text is cut off from view. Can you please remedy this? Thank you.

    • By the way, I entirely agree with the points made by Holland4MPE below. It is a simple and elegant solution which is simply based upon the actual facts of how money is truly created.

    • Dark Dirk permalink

      Sorry, I have to remedy my english skills first. Just ignore my post.

      • Only by speaking your mind will you learn the language Dark Dirk and your words are usually completely comprehensible!

    • I don’t have this problem earthlinggb, and I don’t hear others complain, nor have they ever. That is: you are talking about the article, right? Some comments can have that problem if they are deeply nested. In that case you can hit ‘reply’ to read the squashed text.

      Otherwise you may have to look at your browser settings, or perhaps a higher resolution?

  21. Hello! Money is credit in circulation. This is the secret of the Red Shields. Credit is belief of one person in another. The mechanism for regulating the circulation is the bank. Often called the second temple but is really the first temple was the origin of credit money circulating in a market. Your guy in the diaper with thorns on his head wrecked the place for good reason. You should not ateempt to regulate life by money arithmetic ie usury. Thanks Rduanewilling.

    • You have hit the core of this ‘delimma’

      Why keep trying to pay off a debt that NEVER existed?

      Just dump the creators of the debt lie and reset a national currency without any members of any international flavor.

      A call to ACTION

      EXCERPT:

      This corporate US makes laws which apply ONLY to those areas and peoples over which the Constitution gives the federal government sovereignty (See US Constitution, Art 1, Sec. 8, and Art. IV, Sec. 3, and Downes Vs. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244). The ignorant sovereign people (the free natural American Citizen of the constitutional united States of America), began to submit to and obey laws which were legally applicable only to “subjects” of the corporate federal US. We were also tricked into legally volunteering to all become “federal persons” by the promise of old age security… that’s right…Social Security…the ever tightening noose around the throat of We the People. This explains why Congress can pass laws about guns and other “protected” topics, and not have such laws declared unconstitutional. They are not legislating for the 50 states or the Citizen of one of those 50 states. If you submit to a law, however, you are judged to be under that law. If you become a “federal person” through application for a social security number, or other federal benefit program, you have traded your birthright for a bowl of pottage (see Esau in the Bible). WE THE SHEEPLE have been voluntarily sheered by our own ignorance! Notice that there is still gold and silver coin being minted today (constitutional money)…but its value is calculated in federal reserve notes, falsely called “dollars”.

      WE MUST NOW reassert our sovereignty! It is time for “We the People” to declare the corporate US to be bankrupt, remove the Federal Reserve from the U.S.of A., and require Congress to turn on the presses and begin minting lawful coins (or Silver and Gold Certificates) which have no debt attached to their creation. Lawful money which is backed by gold, silver, and the productivity of Sovereign Americans. If you have understood how the debt is created, you know that it has been a fraud from the outset. It is no more a legal debt than Federal Reserve Notes are legal money. It is a “Corporate debt” of the federal corporation known as the “UNITED STATES”, which is NOT the constitutional entity established in 1791.

      Theunjustmedia.com

      • You’re right to want to eliminate our submission to admiralty (eg., banker) law and all of its fictions, most notably our strawman, but I also hope that you do not also advocate an elimination of safety net/retirement programs and return to the commodity backed money. Social security in particular is not exactly a benefit but more of a contractual obligation since the worker is owed a return on their money taken out of their wages over the span of their working lives. The problem of commodity money is as old as money itself: fractional lending. It has always devolved into it and always will — simply because it is inherently possible to do so. The only real solution is debt free credit or fiat.

        • Thhis is so and no I do not advocate jumping into a malestrom to get off the spit.
          Once the International Bankers are routed out of ALL government beginning with the Fed Res a system must be in place immediately to stop the current SS addiction and trust people have in it being the great life jacket with umbrella drinks in a warm pool.

          We would have to vet every SS recipient ( now THAT would create massive jobs ! )
          and remove all payments from illegals for a start and everywhere there are one person getting multipla payments under various IDs
          I could write a chapter on that after living in Brooklyn for 25 years ! and where is all that medicaid money going on its pathway to telaviv.

          But thats not here and now
          What I can envision is all workers pay into a retirement account that keeps a portion for the state and most of it they are requested to invest . My best idea here at present is into the very employers for a SHARE in the whole as workers who own even a small share do worker better, harder, longer and are willing to keep learning about their own skills and possible new ones offered by those employers along with annual paid two weeks vaca for any employee on board for more than three years. A company owned cruise ship and a resort with high end accommodations so all expanse can be held down and the employees will not be wont to destroy steal or overuse the goodies as they have been shown they are part owners of said ship, resort, mountain retreat near fine trout streams.

          Once such a system is being set up and businesses great and small see the benefits of these arrangements all those people who would have entered the destructive SS system wil happily join those businesses or corps that have such stabilizing contracts with their employees who have elevated status to co-owner

          In my world view most thralls do need supervision and guidance
          Where best to offer such is via their necessary skills and talents that the state needs
          workers are the base upon which the nation is built

          Under this sort of system any employee who has above average skills and work ethic would be taken into higher education to move up in responsibility in the company.

          This needs open hearted and intelligent people to plan, create and implement
          It cannot be done until we totally divorce by whatever means the current greed and hate motivated controllers of all our futures and our grandchildrens hopes for any life other than deeper slavery than we have yet known

          when all the legal members of the state have vested interests in production and integrity
          the whole state rises in job creation, harmony among the folk and greater production.

          This is only my own little thinking process well informed by a state that did much of this to huge success about 70 years ago, ;)

          This is predicated on two major moves

          one) remove all bankers and their acolytes from all offices and govt positions

          two) close all borders and begin removing the MILLIONS of illegals getting benefits from every existing program

          The next step must be decided by local activists and AND national wise ones all co-operating to get a program into works that benefit the workers. retirees, and the state

          Retirees have their shares of their former employers company as well as a guarantee by the state in case of any unseen emergencies
          The state would also guarantee assistance to any employer who was in a slump so it maintained its share payments to those retirees.

          Tax monies would have been invested over the broad spectrum of business’ so as to keep the base solid as well as investments in friendly and prosperous foreign nations keeping TRADE lines harmonious and healthy

          There would be only one bank ala Andrew Jackson that would be duty bound to oversee all investments to keep it solid. Those sitting in the advisers posts have only five yer terms and must be approved by each state .

          carry this as far as you want. I am not hidebound to any part except getting rid of the current FedRes and all those who have been part of the deceptions

          and all illegals who are bleeding America dry under false pretenses

          any other ideas are of course most welcome and no we cannot toss older persons over board on the way to a better system. ( I am one of them :) )

          `

          • I agree with your ideas. I think a reform in banking will naturally create so many jobs that many of these safety net programs will not be needed. But in the meantime, there is will be no other choice but to honor them. I just wanted to make sure you were of the Malthusian sort that believe the poor enjoyed being depend upon entitlements and were committing fraud as a means to escape work. That is the banker shill republican and Austrian school lame excuse for committing economic mass murder.

            Since you live in Brooklyn NY maybe you know about Randy Credico’s candidacy for mayor? If not, I wouldn’ t be surprised as the mainstream media have run a complete blackout on coverage of him. He proposes a wallstreet sales tax as well as a new deal style program to get New York and new Yorkers out of debt and into full employment. He is infinitely better than Deblasio. http://www.credico2013.org/

            Regardless of the outcome he has also started up the Tax Wallstreet Party and is asking people from all over the nation to begin their own chapters in their respective cities and states. You need not be tied to partisan affiliations either. As long as you agree with the core program of anti austerity, and nationalizing the Fed for the purpose creating jobs and prosperity for all with interest free credit, any political orientation can get involved. http://www.taxwallstreetparty.org/

            • Been outta Brooklyn for six years, some of it I sorely miss, most of it I never think about. It,

              IS a powder keg of multi culti ready to implode and those cousins of the tribe are prime targets of the black , Asian, Spanish communities BECAUSE they have been victims and relate personally to being cast into the role of slave to the sidecurl cabal.
              Street lingo is often directed at those thieves, and los que están sucios perros! :D

              You wrote: ” the poor enjoyed being depend upon entitlements and were committing fraud as a means to escape work ”
              No I have seen with my own eyes that many people of all races want to work and take care of their families and have a weekly BBQ or mini fiesta but are unable as money is so scarce down in the thrall level
              I am way out of Brooklyn and sink deeper yearly now surviving week by week and see increasing poverty all around me.

              I do not see ALL assistance recipients as slackers but it is a growing philosophy especially among non English speakers who are often also illegal holding three or more IDs getting support under many names and doing a job or crime for more cash money

              This is hugely degrading all levels of social order even up to the Ocean Parkway ELITE who teach illegals to stay illegal so they can pay them less for nanny, yardman, housecleaner etc.

              If you know Brooklyn at all see between these cryptic remarks, lolz.

              The revolushun is THIS CLOSE and it will start in a spot like Brooklyn between Crown Heights and east NY or similar over some venerated rabbis vehicle entourage running down a little black kid and not taking the black kid to hosp so he died right there.

              Dinkins was mayor back then and race tensions were rife at the least
              It WILL blow up and spread across this once pristine land.

              We can see this as opportunity and as so many have called for UNITE and clean out our own national Agean Stables bringing in fresh water and new hay to fuel the engines of our recovery.

              In this process all the slackers ala Malthus will be vetted out and sent to camps to await deportation to wherever they came from or where will take them if any where
              Or a life inside the camp farms raising food for the nations people to buy GROWN
              in America. not China or Brazil or over oceans using petrol and creating openings for fraud and baksheesh at every turn

              Yes u see too that from this many jobs will be created and more people paying a share into company retirement funds and state guaranteed funds AND personal investment accounts in American job creators

              As a great Statesman of the last century said ” jobs for the workers, paying a decent wage because they are the very foundation on which the state stands.”

              HWR! ( u kno )

  22. Sure, you can “repay” interest, “even if the money supply is constant…” but a) *IF* we did [by bank spending back into the general circulation], is it right that a mere publisher of further representations of our promissory obligations merely launders so much wealth into their possession. b) DO we actually sell so much of our production as principal + interest, as allows us to actually “repay” falsified debts; and, c) is it even mathematically possible to do so, being as our production only equals the principal. Only Mathematically Perfected Economy solves all these issues. http://www.perfectedeconomy.org, Mike Montagne

    ALL ORIGINAL MATERIAL, including resolution of the only justifiable purposes and states of money; intrinsic determinations of disparity and cause; original proof that any rate of interest which requires re-borrowing interest is inherently terminal; determinate rationale of solution; original demonstrations of categoric faults; resultant proof of singular solution; invalidations of all deviating theses; and original explanations of the present obfuscation of our promissory obligations to each other… are COPYRIGHT 1968 to present by mike montagne, founder of PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™ and original 1968 architect of mathematically perfected economy™. ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED.

    TRADEMARKS: PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy™; PFMPE™; PFMPE+ACR™; PEOPLE For Perfected Economy™; [COUNTRY/LOCALE] For Mathematically Perfected Economy™; [COUNTRY/LOCALE] For Perfected Economy™; Mathematically Perfected Economy™; MPE™; absolute consensual representation™; ACR™; mathematically perfected economy and absolute consensual representation™; MPE+ACR™; MPE+ACR Perpetuation Trust™, [its IBC] PFMPE+ACR In Perpetuation Society Anonyme™, Mathematically Perfected Currency™; MPC™; OBFUSCATION OF THE CURRENCY™; OBFUSCATION OF THE PROMISSORY OBLIGATION™; mathematic perfection of economy™; perfect economy™; perfected economy™; names, logos, and distinguishably original, intrinsic terms; the various slogans of these pages; and the unique meanings of terms and expressions as established by this work… are trademarks of mike montagne for the common purpose of establishing mathematically perfected economy™ without division or compromisation of vital principles by eleventh hour impostors.

    • Well, in all fairness, the Swiss were doing it already in the thirties Jake……

      • Oh, and by the way, the US Treasury was already doing it in the mid 1800’s……..

        • Doing what Anthony?

          • providing interest free double ledger bookkeeping based credit. Aka Mutual Credit, of which MPE is a subset.

            • In my opinion Mutual Credit has become a subset of MPE given MPE´s solution for inflation/deflation. Demurrage is also non existent in MPE (not necessarily existing in MC either). But the thinking is along the same lines for sure.

  23. “It’s an important issue. The Mainstream and the Austrians have been getting to terms with the original P + I > P equation.”

    And Keynesians and their successors have been talking about this problem for more than 80 years now. Our man here has just used Friedman’s mathematics (which he refers to as “Mainstream”) to prove Keynes was right.

    “The argument in its original form is no longer operable. More importantly: we owe it to ourselves and the people we talk with to get to the heart of the matter and take both truth and their arguments seriously, if they have merit.”

    Welcome to the light. You’ve now rediscovered a dirty little secret that was excised from the textbooks in the 80’s, but never stopped being true.

    “In an ideal scenario, when velocity is sufficient and the interest is spent back into circulation, principal plus interest can be repaid.”

    It can also be repaid if the Government makes the offending kleptocrats repay enough of their takings through taxes. But otherwise it creates financial collapses as it is completely drains local economies. And since the wealthy self-segregate, even local taxation won’t do it, and at this point, efforts to rectify things at a country level lead to migrations of wealthy people to other countries.

    “But for other reasons, the basic problem still is the same: velocity is very low in practice, making it impossible to pay for both and the leaking of money to the financial economy, the ‘upper loop’ is probably even worse.”

    Yep, welcome to Keynesian economics.

    “I hope this article can lead to further discussion, perhaps the experts can shoot a hole in it, making it irrelevant or better. I’m not a mathematician, and I’m pretty sure people like Gauvin, Turmel or Montagne would put it more elegantly, but I hope to have made the point clear.”

    Or John Maynard Keynes.

    • I never heard JMK resist Usury Christopher, nor propose interest free units. He was a brilliant man, but also an important pawn of the Money Power.

  24. When you write about the case “Good circulation, interest not spent into circulation.”

    “Now let’s see what happens if velocity is 20. I go into debt, pay my supplier and he busy with me. I save 1 because I know I need to pay interest at the end of the year, so I by 99 worth with him. He buys 99 with me and I save another 1 for the interest payment. In the final transaction, I have saved 9, my partner buys 91 with me and I collect the remaining 1 for the interest payment. I have the interest, but only 90 for the principal.
    It matters not, whether I save to settle the interest payment at the end of the year, or whether I pay the interest immediately, while the lender does not spend it. If the interest is not immediately circulated, no matter the speed of circulation of the remaining money supply, there will be a shortage of money. I will not have enough to pay off P + I.
    Again: P < P + I still stands."

    And this is precisely the case that small communities face with large monopolies and conglomerates. The money generated by local commerce goes to pay for groceries at (say) Walmart — and that money goes to make the owners wealthy and to the gated communities and HQ communities where they and their fellow ultra-rich live.

    But the shortage of money is not the only problem generated by that scenario. A shortage of money creates a vacuum that others notice. Monsanto and General Foods will come in and start buying up farmland, developers will close down the local stores and bulldoze them trying to figure out what to replace them with, and the ability of local people to keep their property will also go down because now they cannot pay off the loans they took out. Often those loans were to finance opening (for example) Walmart stores locally on the premise it would create jobs.

    • indeed.

  25. When I hear “velocity of circulation” you are listening to an economist whose POV is with the Friedman school. And when you say: “Interest-Free Economics has always assumed that P=Money Supply (MS) if the money supply is debt-based. This ignores the crucial factor of velocity, the number of times the money supply changes hands in a given time span. The effective money supply (r(eal)MS) is Principal x Velocity: rMS = P x V.” you are rediscovering Keynesian economics.

    “Another vital issue is the question whether the interest is spent back into circulation. If it is not, it is bound to cause problems.”

    You are using Milton Friedman’s mathematics to rediscover “The Liquidity Trap” which is this very situation where investors don’t spend money from their income back in the communities they draw the money from.

    Great Job!

    • I don’t claim any of the issues that I discuss Christopher. My job is to transcend all schools of thought and create my own by taking the best of all and forgetting about their many mistakes.

  26. Very well articulated on THE MOST important topic on the planet. Agreed, under optimal conditions interest can be paid. However, we must admit that psychopaths control this system. The “den of thieves” engineer loan defaults and usury is an asset confiscation scheme. Through this fraudulent mechanism they have confiscated and gained title to all the land on the planet. Interest isn’t about profit, it’s about control. Interest is the silent destroyer where few notice that they are being warred upon.

    Additionally, expanding the definition of “usury” is useful. Usury is not simply ANY interest. It is the privatization of humanity’s sovereign barter system. Through cartels of control like: Federal Reserve Notes, gold, silver or Bitcoins the elite hijack our energy exchange system. The “use” our energy to USURP our sovereignty. This would occur under a “perfect” Greenback system as well even without interest at the time of issuance. An elite few would “use” our energy and not necessarily produce something of value to humanity. Perhaps, the Greenback technology would be used for genocide like Lincoln and Hitler did.

    The optimal solution appears to be decentralized usuryFree barter scrip and mutual credit.

    • Having a number of different complementary interassociated local currencies would be ideal, but getting there on a nationwide scale seems impossible, like herding cats. The notion is just too far beyond most people’s intellectual horizon. It’s the only reason i prefer to nationalize the Fed and assign control of regulating the volume of the money supply to the individual states. It’s an shorter route politically to convert the end-the-fed ppl than to ask them scrape the whole system and to join what must seem like a Robert Owens style monetary movement. (btw, who did Lincoln commit genocide against — landed plantation gentry?)

      Are you still doing a radio show somewhere? I didn’t see your progrram listed on Republic broadcasting last time i checked. If not maybe you can team up with Anthony. I think he’s ready for prime time based on his last interview with tony stark.

    • Why can’t you name these “psychopaths”? They’re Jews. Jews have been the orchestrators of all our ills.

      Till we start naming the culprits nothing will change. Well that’s not true. Things will only get worse, and eventually we will all be dead along with any descendants.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Newlyweds Want to Spend and Pay Down Debt – Fox Business | Russ Finance
  2. Cause and Effects of Money Scarcity | Real Currencies
  3. Why Tom Woods is wrong about the Greenbackers | Real Currencies

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,031 other followers

%d bloggers like this: