Skip to content

Gordon Duff, Nazis and the unmistakably macho allure of ‘Anti-Semitism’

by on January 30, 2013
gegen nazis

Many realize these days that Jewish Supremacism and the Money Power are intricately linked. As a result Nazism is making somewhat of a come back. But are Socialism and Hitler worship really the answer to Money Power and the Jewish Question?

Recently Gordon Duff insulted some self declared Nazis by claiming that some of their outlets, including http://www.ratfacedjews.com and http://www.thejewishproblem.com were owned by the ADL. Typically, he offered no proof whatsoever.

Duff is an interesting fellow. He’s undoubtedly upset by the many atrocities of The Powers That Be. He’s also a well connected intelligence operative, with ‘extensive experience in international banking’. According to his bioDuff currently serves on the boards of the Adamus Group, one of the world’s largest energy technology firms and of a private financial institution participating in the Federal Reserve Banking group‘.

As Faux Capitalist’s Jason Erb observes: is this bio satire?

Duff also claims to lie about 40% of the time, because he otherwise would be dead. My rule of thumb usually is that good disinformation is about 90% correct. Clearly Duff is either a well managed plant, or a loose canon out there to add to the ever mounting confusion.

Does this mean he’s wrong about those sites? I don’t know about the ADL owning them. It’s possible and they do it all the time, as we know. Most ‘anti-semitism’ must be organized by our bosses, because there is so little of it out there. But when looking at http://www.ratfacedjews.com, run by Mike Delaney of Prothink.com fame, there are a number of items that are interesting.

The moral high ground of ‘anti-semitism’
‘Anti-Semitism’, the word the Money Power created to label opposition to Jewish Supremacy and Money Power itself, is really an interesting position to take. It’s so politically incorrect, that it’s actually thrilling to break through it. Once you feel the inner liberation of accepting that Jewish Supremacism is real and an integral part of the ‘New World Order’ created by the Money Power, it’s exciting to become candid about it. There is a certain pleasure in the shock it generates in the non-initiated. This is just one of the little perks that come along with living truth.

However, as with all earthly pleasures, it’s easily overdone.

Being ‘anti-semitic’ together on Stormfront creates a pleasant ‘esprit de corps’, quite similar to that of Jewry itself: a sense of superiority for knowing and the enjoyment of power by speaking ‘truth’, even if it is not really truth and not really helping either.

And this is the case with many people opening up to the real world: they go overboard, saying the problem is exclusively Jewish. That all real culprits are Jews and that all Jews are culprits.

However, in the real world everything is decided by numbers: a gentile billionaire is more valuable than a poor Jew. If he plays along, that is.

Furthermore, there is the issue of bloodlines: not all of them are Jewish, although the Black Nobility and Finance Capitalism (the ‘international Jew’) seem to have fused long ago.

Third, there is the issue that many believe that the 10 lost tribes of Israel are in fact the English speaking world. People like Elizabeth II seem to believe this. Implying they consider themselves Israelites: the ‘real’ Jews. The fact is: we don’t even really know who ‘the Jews’ are…..The British, the Khazars, the Palestinians, you tell me.

And let’s not forget the Masons. True: Freemasonry is basically Kabbalah for Gentiles and indeed: the Freemasons are not to survive the Revolution they work so hard to create, as they found out both in Russia and under Nazism. But still: hundreds of thousands of ‘elite’ gentiles are actively furthering the agenda.

Is there really anybody out there who believes the Plutocracy cares about Jews? Of course not. The Jews as a nation/race/religion are just another bunch of easily manipulable idiots, just like the Gentiles. You tell them they are unique, the Chosen Ones and that they are hated because they are so splendid. True: this modus operandi was probably invented by the handlers of Jewry, but nowadays it’s just common practice.

Look at the US for a good example. The City on the Hill, the land of the Brave and the Free, the One Indispensable Nation, so hated because of their freedom! And lo and behold: the 99% take up arms against a sea of troubles to defend the ‘Free World’, all the while making the world even more safe for Goldman Sachs and Exxon. Hitler did the same to Germany and even here in puny Holland we tend to believe we live in the best country in the world.

We see in the living conditions of the poor in Israel how much the Money Power cares. A better example still is the way Zionism promoted the ethnic cleansing of Europe, maintaining ‘a cow in Palestine is worth more than a child in the US’.
It seems quite clear that part of the plan is to destroy Zionism (in the modern sense of a homeland for the chosen people, Zionism in reality is about the conquest of the entire universe) and to finally get their offering to their Gods of 6 million sheep.

No, not all Jews are assholes and not all assholes are Jews. It’s just common sense.

And no, I’m not naive about what’s taking place in the Synagogues and other cozy Jewish get-togethers.

However, bona fide nazi sites like http://www.ratfacedjews.com do have a comfortable position within the ‘truth movement’, because they at least have the guts to call a spade a spade. The politically correct euphemisms avoiding the annoying truth that we are run by money and that money is run mostly by Jewish bankers and that Jews are overrepresented in many of the higher echelons of society, are becoming staler by the day. For those trying to hide behind them while claiming they are opposing evil, it is becoming harder and harder to maintain credibility.

Our Eternal Leader
Foulmouthing Jewish Supremacism and its lackeys, however pleasant and even necessary, is in itself not enough to have much of an impact, other than divisiveness. The problem is real, but analysis never solved anything: it’s action that counts, based on a solid program. And Nazism as a program……are we serious?

Looking at some of the articles at http://www.ratfacedjew.com it is clear that the thinking there stopped at about 1939.

To begin with, there is this silly Hitler worship. Clearly, Hitler is not the big bad ogre that was created by British and Soviet propaganda. When listening to Hitler’s speeches, or reading his Mein Kampf, clearly a major revision of the Second World War is necessary. It’s certainly true that Stalin was about to invade Europe when he was surprised by Hitler and also that Chamberlain and Churchill did everything in their power to sucker Hitler into war.
People like Mark Weber have done successful work on that.

However, while Hitler was just another dictator, not more demonic than Churchill, Roosevelt or Stalin, he was also working for the same people that brought us most other tyrants. Makow is one of those who have done much to expose this fact. For which he is much maligned by our Nazi friends.

According to the Nazis, ‘Anyone who denies the greatness of our eternal hero, Adolf Hitler, is either a fraud or a brainwashed idiot’. But this is of course nonsense. International Finance paid for Hitler’s rise, as Sutton and others have documented. Also, Hitler’s decisions during the war are so pathetic, he must have been a traitor. Many in his High Command thought so, anyway.

Here’s just a short list of the kind of issues any clear headed analysis of Hitler must explain:
– In Mein Kampf Hitler perfectly analyzed Marxism and Bolshevism to be enemy hoaxes. But he also believed Britain was a bunch of Aryan brothers to be enlisted against the Marxist threat. Apparently Hitler was oblivious to the fact the City of London (the archetypal HQ of International Finance) actually owned and ran the British Empire. So how credible is that?
– He did the stupidest thing possible when attacking Russia: his invasion was weakened by lack of a clear target. Instead of directing one massive pincer at Moscow, which would have certainly succeeded, he screwed up by sending large parts of his army both north and south. The result was Moscow held late 1941 and the Wehrmacht got bogged down first by the mud, then by the cold.
– His refusal to build the Bomb.  Because he thought it was too brutal……
– His refusal to occupy Gibraltar and thus controlling the Mediterranean and closing the Suez Canal.
– His suicidal ‘hold every inch of occupied territory’ while while being forced out of Russia, refusing his Generals a rational deepening of their lines and exposing his men to Russia’s main strength, its artillery.
– The fact that Bormann, Hitler’s secretary (handler), was most likely the one sending German High Command secrets to Moscow.
– How he let Britain’s best escape from Dunkirk. This was the core of their professional army. Without it the British would have had to build a conscription army without experience, which would have been a horrible handicap.

The Nazi Program
So what exactly is the Nazi program?
According to Mike Delaney, ‘those of us in the real truth movement are promoting a working people’s Fascist movement – populist, collectivist socialism which places the state as the core power of society, rather than promoting inhuman industrial forces to this position – as an obvious means to bring justice to our society’.

Interestingly, this quote is preceded by a withering attack on Libertarianism as ‘Jewish Free Market Capitalism’. Fair enough: this is just a good example of the dialectic at work. Of course we don’t want ‘Jewish Free Market Capitalism’. No. we want a big strong state. We are talking national SOCIALISM. Much different from ‘normal’ socialism, I guess. The question remains the same: who owns the State?

As we know, Hitler ruled through a coalition with Germany’s leading industrialists, who were to make a bundle first from reconstructing Germany and then in the war. Gottfried Feder, who was the leader of the Nazi ‘left’ and famous for his fight against Usury was sidelined in the late thirties and from then on Nazism was fully connected to the industrial powers that be. And through that, to International Finance. For instance: IG Farben, Germany’s leading chemical powerhouse, merged with Rockefeller’s Standard Oil in the thirties. In fact: the synthetic fuel that the Nazis generated from coal to keep their war machine going was a Standard Oil patent.

Nazism, as a form of socialism, is about making the individual small and the State big. It is about making people cogs in the great machine. It is about taking our children through the Hitler Jugend (a much superior education awaits them there!) and making good soldiers out of them.

Remember: the goal of the Protocols is a grandiose Despotism with the Omnipotent State as the source of everything and all.

It is reminiscent of the old Rabbi adage ‘some call it Marxism, I call it Judaism’.

So we can conclude without a shadow of a doubt, that National Socialism is just one more collectivist ruse of our Mind Controllers.

Conclusion
The problem is not Jewry. It’s not even Usury. It’s Ego. This is a spiritual war. The forces of self vs. those crucifying self.
The ultra rich and their ‘New World Order’ only exist to show us what happens if we worship the false gods of Power, Sex, Money, Fame, Security, Nationalism, etc. Not that there is something wrong with any of these. It’s about identifying with them, being attached to them. To believe: I am my power. My money. My Nation. My body, thoughts or feelings. The women I sleep with.

Resistance is about first and foremost starting to understand we are part of the problem. Because we identify with ‘self’, instead of God. This is not to say we want theocracy. We don’t. The only question that creates is, who owns God?

God lives within us all. By crucifying self and shutting down the endless blathering of mind, senses and emotion, we can connect to the Great Architect (just kidding) Himself.

From there we can devise plans that are real. Real because they balance the individual’s needs with those of the Common Wealth. Real because they don’t exploit people, but elevate them. Because they are about sharing, instead of monopolizing.

The alternative is to succumb to what the ‘Jews’ want. To what Satan wants: an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth. This is what Hitler succumbed to and we all know what price the Germans paid for falling for it.

It is Love that overcomes. And not the degenerate kind of ‘oh we’re all so ok and really sparing each other’s feelings, right?’.

“Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.” (John 15:13)

When there is no self, there is no fear of death.

When self has died, Life has begun.

Evil cannot be beaten. You don’t fight darkness, you turn on the Light.

Related:
Demystifying the ‘Conspiracy’
Yes, the Money Power is Jewish
Is Anti Usury Activism Antisemitic?
The Conspiracy is Spiritual in Essence

67 Comments
  1. Alan permalink

    Good discussion of a complex subject. While I am not a believer in any religion and know of no “god” I still agree with much of your Conclusion.

    Did Hitler want an alliance with his British “Aryan brothers” to the point of wishful thinking? At first, yes. But then Mein Kampf was written when? Should he not have tried for peace to the last moment in 1940 after Britain and France declared war on him? The USSR was only too happy to see him engaged in France in the Spring of 40. I do agree, idealism at times clouded his judgments and decisions. With Dunkirk a likely result.

    Regarding Moscow 1941:

    1) Rain and mud and primitive roads slowed the German advance, true. Hitler was ultimately responsible for Barbarossa, but under him was the General Staff – why did they fail to prepare the troops with winter gear when the operation had been planned for over a year? Freezing weather rather than wet mud or slush was at times preferred. Vehicles could move over frozen ground but slush and mud was another story. After the rain, a freezing period was a welcome thing for German transport. Read Skorzeny about the approach to Moscow in December 41 and what it was like to someone who was there.

    2) No mention was made of the critical contribution of the Siberian reinforcements that were moved to the defense of Moscow in the nick of time …and only able to be moved because the Soviets found out they didn’t have to worry about a Japanese attack in the East. And why was that? Because Stalin got the word on that Japanese decision from a spy in Tokyo named Richard Sorge – a German who adopted the communist cause.

    3) Yes, Moscow was not assaulted directly but then the Germans bagged over 600,000 Soviet troops, over 800 tanks thousands of artillery cannon in the big encirclement campaign – all this would have had a devastating, possibly war-winning effect on the outcome of the war in 1941-42 had the German military not been shot through with spies and treason. German operations on the Eastern front were nearly always successful whenever the Soviet General Staff did not get forewarning from their network of spies in Germany. Even with advance knowledge they were losing at first.

    4) Bormann -no argument that he was a negative presence for Hitler and Germany- likely wasn’t the major spy (known as “Werther”) that caused so much damage to the German war effort and possibly contributed more than any other to Germany losing the war. Bormann was a regular soldier only near the end of WW1, saw no combat – a soldier but not an educated experienced military officer and strategist who’d know what was most important and useful for the Red Army Staff in Moscow. He did not have daily access to the military briefings of Hitler and the German High Command at the decision making moments nor could he have found out these decisions timely enough to pass them on- his duties simply were elsewhere. But I too am aware -and also initially bought into- the claim of Bormann having been “Werther” in the memoirs of…. oh, right: Reinhard Gehlen.

    Read Otto Skorzeny’s “Meine Kommando Unternehmen” (My Commando Operations). He clears up and fills in the blanks as to why Hitler made some of the decisions he did . Sometimes he validates Hitler’s choices and actions, sometimes not. But I’ve cross-checked enough of Skorzeny’s positions and statements to accept that he’s spitting out the truth in that book. Skorzeny, somewhat vaguely, or coyly (keeping in mind the West German “spy chief” Gehlen was alive at the time) appears to have pointed at Gehlen himself as having actually been the elusive spy “Werther”.

    5) Regarding what some have said about “Nazism” and the Occult, I’d direct anyone to read Hitler’s public address in Nuremberg of September 6, 1938 where he said:

    “National Socialism is not a cult-movement — a movement for worship; it is exclusively a “volkic” political doctrine based upon racial principles. In its purpose there is no mystic cult, only the care and leadership of a people defined by a common blood-relationship. Therefore we have no rooms for worship, but only halls for the people — no open spaces for worship, but spaces for assemblies and parades.

    “We have no religious retreats, but arenas for sports and playing-fields, and the characteristic feature of our places of assembly is not the mystical gloom of a cathedral, but the brightness and light of a room or hall which combines beauty with fitness for its purpose. In these halls no acts of worship are celebrated, they are exclusively devoted to gatherings of the people of the kind which we have come to know in the course of our long struggle; to such gatherings we have become accustomed and we wish to maintain them. We will not allow mystically-minded occult folk with a passion for exploring the secrets of the world beyond to steal into our Movement.

    “Such folk are not National Socialists, but something else — in any case, something which has nothing to do with us. At the head of our program there stand no secret surmising but clear-cut perception and straightforward profession of belief. But since we set as the central point of this perception and of this profession of belief the maintenance and hence the security for the future of a being formed by God, we thus serve the maintenance of a divine work and fulfill a divine will — not in the secret twilight of a new house of worship, but openly before the face of the Lord. ”

    So, out in public before his “impressionable followers” and Hitler himself was deriding mysticism and “the occult”. Is there more needed to be said about “Nazi occultism”?

  2. Christianity is a Jewish construct, it’s Judaism for Gentiles, promoting weakness.

    Jews have been engaging in the same usurious and otherwise devilish practices for the last several millennia. It isn’t anything new. They are a community who work toward Jewish interests. They wish to rule the world.

    • Chris permalink

      You should sit down with Ape Foxman who thinks Christ was the biggest anti semite ever.

      Go learn something rather then being a fool for the Jew

      http://christogenea.org/content/amos-part-3-christogenea-talkshoe-02-15-2013

    • Christianity is first and foremost about the man Jesus. Jesus was on earth the hardest man ever. Jesus was not weak.. When He drove the money changers (bankers) from the temple He did it with no help…even Peter who was prepared to use a tool on anyone who wanted to mess with him was not in the picture…Jesus walked into a place protected by hard core gangsters and kicked the shit out of all of them………….So………….let’s get some facts right? BUT ….Jesus as the ultimate man, showed gentleness,compassion and ultimate meekness because He is the ultimate example of love….that is so TOTALLY at odds with Judaism. Jesus could have resisted the Jews who arrested Him at Gethsemane and when Peter took out his sword and cut someone’s ear off Jesus told him to quit because Jesus was going to the cross for His people to show the level of God’s love which we ..even in our best moments…can’t even get near. How the frick is Jesus “jewish”? He was born into the tribe of Judah ( Judean…later Jew…dah) but He lived as a Nazarene….Jesus of Nazareth….not Jesus of Jerusalem….and when the disciples started going gaga about Herods temple (not God’s temple…Herods temple) Jesus told them …”this abomination is toast”…..J3…..when you have read and understood the scriptures let me know! BTW….I DO agree that most of modern Christianity is feminised and judaised and definitely in the west but that is judgement from God….see Michael Hoffman re Christianity and Usury.

  3. Henrique permalink

    I personally think that whatever Germany did in the 20’s or 30’s would end up leading to the same results, given the atrocious conditions stipulated by the peace of Versailles that plunged the country into debt and hiper-inflation ( perfect slavery to the Money-Massas ). Germany is geopolitically doomed, surrounded by Powers, and no real independence would be allowed them, no surprise move. Nazism has deep occult roots, all that symbolism relating to the Thule Society, and Aryanism ( which after the war became a caricature of the loser white man ). To begin with ( and this is something that no one seems to notice ) why the hell NAZI as an acronym instead of NASO ( for Nazional-Sozialismus ) ? According to Alan Watt, in my opinion the best researcher and “truther” out there by far, NAZI is the name of the head of the Sanhedrin, a form of Council of important Rabbis throughout history. Not mentioning that most High Nazi officers were ex-Communists, and that just prior to the war there was extense ( but not public ) collaboration between Nazis and Soviets. I tend to think it WAS, indeed all a facade, like almost every large-scale event in History. Try this website cuttingthroughthematrix.com. He doesn’t sell water filters or gold bars like some of “our heroes”. I assure you, there’s no one more down to earth and rational. Your article is brilliant, I always appreciate courage. Greetings from Brazil.

  4. [Acts 17:26] and he made of one every nation of men to dwell on all the face of the earth, having determined their appointed seasons, and the bounds of their habitation;

    http://www.yamaguchy.com/images/multicult.txt

    Perhaps, the ‘appointed season’ of white people is over; time to give way to others; time for white supremacists and everybode else to face reality

    >>>>The Awakening – A critical mass of people comes to clearly see the common flaws of the economic policies of all the earth’s present governments.

    The awakening would be the recognising that there is no –have not been, and will not be– what you imagine in your dopeful fantacy; so sell your book, make your money, fatten your bank (Rothschild bank) account; promote the use of VISA, MC, American Express, PayPal

    >>>>Economic Cures They Don’t Want You To Know About
    “They” are NOT hiding anything; information is out there –has been for 200 years– freely, easily, widely available to anyone; people are not interested

    • I know name, I know.

      But the struggle is not about results. Results belong to the One.The struggle is for us.

      • Save the syrupy dog-shit for village idiots and paypal donors
        (write, instead, an article based on that 2004 report and commentary)

    • A few dozen books on the second bank of the united states—

      http://openlibrary.org/search?subject_facet=Bank%20of%20the%20United%20States%20(1816-1836)

  5. This article really resonated with me and is pretty much what I also concluded in my book by advocating the law of love as the cornerstone wuth jury as the 4th pillar of power to oversee the other three pillars of judiciary, executive and legislative:

    http://www.drmz.net/dm/catalog.html

    Show me a chair that stands on three legs. No wonder government doesn’t work!

    • Trial by a jury of one’s peers is clearly the way forward.

      The war of the sexes will also have to be settled before real change is possible.

      • Trial by jury has been part of US constitution for a long time

  6. In 1932 Hitler acquired German citizenship and ran for president, coming second to von Hindenburg. Later that year the Nazi party acquired 230 seats in the Reichstag, making them the largest party in Germany. Helped by support from conservative politicians believing they could control Hitler, he was appointed Chancellor of Germany on January 30th 1933. Hitler moved with great speed to isolate and expel opponents from power, shutting trade unions, removing communists, conservatives and Jews.

    • Sorry, this was spammed

  7. ole permalink

    This is an interesting read.

    If I may offer some insight on the Christ part however: people would do well to investigate Christianity with the same astuteness as they do other subjects.
    The whole “Christ within” mantra is part of what could be summed up as the New Age movement, which is Satanic in nature like every other false doctrine. It is an individualistic and subjective approach to spirituality, completely open to error and delusion.

    But it’s all about the “experience” of Christ, right ?

    Well no, it’s not.
    Society needs rules, boundaries, coherency. Even in matters of faith. Individuals cannot provide this for themselves. Like it or not, you will need theocracy. Anything else is bound to fail.
    Even worse, this line of thinking is paving the way for the Antichrist. It is entirely possible that the current NWO is being built only to be taken down and deceive even the very elect.

    Always remember that this temporal world is only a means to an end. The stake is your immortal soul.

    • Even the very elect WILL be deceived.
      Contrary to what people think, after the great brouhaha is over and the Nations clamor for the New World Order to save us from even more trouble, they do intend a great Despotism, but for most people it will look like a utopia, including interest free money and free energy.

      But on a totally materialistic basis with the State as the center of all.

      I think I know where you are coming from with the ‘Christ within’ thing. In New Age they talk about the ‘higher self’ and they automatically claim this is Christ. However, this allows the Ego to usurp Christ. ‘Higher’ Self is still self.

      That’s why I say we’re all in Christ.

      But it is most assuredly true that it is our birth right to enjoy direct communion with the One through Christ. The goal is to completely submit to that authority and destroy all voices of self. That’s the example that Christ gave us.

      I don’t believe we need a temporal power (‘theocracy’) to maintain this obedience. We live in a ‘free will’ zone. Christ wants us to submit voluntarily.

      Obviously, when sufficient people in society do this, Government will be an expression of this.

  8. Indeed, in the alternation of the night and the day and [in] what Allah has created in the heavens and the earth are signs for a people who fear Allah. Quran 10:6

    Quranic perspective:
    “As God loves virtue, His Holiness means that He does not love vice. But both virtue and vice are not abstract concepts that are floating in the air. They acquire their concrete meaning only as they are embodied in the actions of a human being. When the human acts virtuously, he/she enjoys the bliss of additional love, hence the Quranic expressions such as Allah loves the righteous, the just, the doers of good. Likewise, when the human acts in a brutal, unjust and evil manner, he/she still enjoys God’s all-encompassing love and care. However, when the Quran states that Allah “does not love” evil doers, the real object of “not loving” is not the sinful person but the negative character or traits of that person. Such traits are not necessarily inescapable and irreversibly tied to the sinful person. Once that person decides to deal with his/her negative trait (s), he/she can immediately enjoy the additional bliss of even greater love.

    “The mutuality of love between God and the human is the source of many other derived forms of love; of prophets, family, friends, neighbors, nation, humanity at large and all of God’s creation including animals, vegetation even inanimate objects such as rivers, trees and mountains.”

    Agree with your article and definitely money usage is moral or immoral. cheers

  9. If you believe in God you probably believe in Satan. And who has Satan as their God?
    As long as there are zionists there will be a zionist problem.

    • I guess that’s the real issue: the Synagogue of Satan. To think that this is a Jewish problem is a mistake, just as to say the Jews have nothing to do with it.

    • It is I only permalink

      The best deception that the devil play upon the people. He make us believe, that he doesn’t exist!
      So just look at the world. all the killing done in the name of “democracy” or religion & tell me that the devil is not existing!

  10. Prominent “nazis” in the US regularly turned out to be federal agents (like that 2008 nazi presidential canditate who was a paid employee); just as may of the web-sites, so I wouldn’t be surprised at all if ratfacedjew was also one such outfit

    >>>>He did the stupidest thing possible when attacking Russia: his invasion was weakened by lack of a clear target. Instead of directing one massive pincer at Moscow, which would have certainly succeeded, he screwed up by sending large parts of his army both north and south. The result was Moscow held late 1941 and the Wehrmacht got bogged down first by the mud, then by the cold.

    My handywork on David Irving’s website:–
    http://www.fpp.co.uk/books/WarPath/index.html

    http://www.fpp.co.uk/books/Hitler/1977/html_chapter/17.html
    “the brackish waters of Masuria had infected him[Hitler] with dysentery, and for fourteen days until mid-August he was afflicted by diarrhea, stomach pains, nausea, aching limbs, shivery feelings, and high temperatures. As the crucial strategic controversy developed in these weeks between Hitler and his generals, his ability to overrule them was impaired by his own physical weakness ; his own grand strategy, which was to set up a vast encircling movement by Army Groups North and South, enveloping Moscow from the rear, was opposed and circumvented by Brauchitsch and his staff, who favored a direct assault on Moscow by Field Marshal von Bock’s Army Group Center. Brauchitsch stayed in Berlin and ignored Hitler’s orders ; Hitler was confined by circumstances to his field headquarters. When the army Commander in Chief did pay a rare visit to the Wolf’s Lair, Hitler vainly warned that the way things were going the fronts would inevitably become static, as they had in World War I. Halder certainly recognized that Hitler was too ill to oppose the army.”

    This Mr. Bock was the same Bock who was part of the group that wanted to blow up Hitler just prior to Munich, but their British fellow-travellers persuaded them not to !!!!; and he was also part of the group that did put a bomb under Hitler’s table in 1944.
    Hitler did have a clear strategy…. it was not followed

    ==========
    Mentor Makow, the bdsm child molestor did much “to expose” what ?!? johnny-cume-lately regurgitator can only expose himself (he may have done so in far away countries); the only thing he knows is what Jeff Rense told him

    (nice article about the incoherent schill)

  11. The Synagogue of Satan NOT true Jews are the problem. True Jews had Mosaic laws which resisted Mammon the best in human history. They had usury-free money and debt Jubilee forgiveness. The King of the Jews proclaimed a debt Jubilee with his very first gospel. A debt Jubilee and usury-free money are the keys to flipping the tables on the Babylonian beast. Unite Jews, Christians, Muslims, believers and non-believers will all unite under that cause.

    • Indeed, I forgot to add that quote, but that’s the whole thing of course. ‘who say they are Jews, but are not and are the synagogue of Satan’.

      Fits the current predicament perfectly. The Money Power hides behind the Jews.

    • ole permalink

      Jews refused Christ though. What do you make of that ?

      • 99% of the people refuse Christ, alas……

  12. Good article Anthony. I think God/Jesus Christ and Satan or if you prefer good and evil are in all of us! It is true to overcome evil it is first necessary to overcome your own ego, self-obsession and selfishness, then you can put the needs of other people and community before oneself.

    The Satanic Jewish banking elites behind the New World Order have pushed rampant consumerism, cultural Marxism, moral relativism and selfish individualism to undermine the family, community and nation in order to leave humanity as a mass of culture less, rootless, materialistic isolated individuals without the bonds of family, community or nation that bind us.

    Until quite recently i believed the establishment propoganda and lies about the national socialists and Adolf Hitler. Whilst i don’t say Hitler was a great guy, he certainly wasn’t the demon he has been portrayed as by the Jew media, and as you say angelic compared to Stalin! However, Hitler was a dictator after all and could be ruthless against opposition which he viewed as a threat as seen by the night of the long knives and murder of Gregor Strasser, Ernst Rohm, etc.

    The late great Ezra Pound seemed to believe fascism/national socialism was a culmination of the age old fight against usury and the usurers. National Socialist policies certainly benefitted the average German unlike the evil policies of the west’s Jewish international banking establishment overlords. I am more of a strasserite though, but don’t like a too powerful centralised state controlling the minutiae of my life as i value my freedom too much. Absolute power corrupts absolutely and it is much better to have devolved power to the people.

    I listened to an interesting revisionist historian Veronica Clark recently on Deanna Spingola’s republican broadcasting radio show. She seems to be well researched and says hitler’s rise was not significantly funded by the Rothchilds / Warburgs/ Rockefellers but by German industrialists, party membership subscriptions, advertising, speaking fees, and Strasser’s left-wing support. I do know there were links between Fritz Thyssen and Prescott Bush and UBS through IG Farben that provided some funding though.
    http://inconvenienthistory.com/archive/2011/volume_3/number_3/demystification_of_the_birth_of_the_nsdap.php

  13. RAVEN permalink

    Tribe of Dan is british Israelite. It was erased with the british identity and history 10 tribes of israel.
    British flag represents the 10 tribes. Im sure judah is of Egypt are imposters. NWO is based on the Babylonian Empire and Egypt. Oh and Mammon is the god of this world.

    Peace

  14. Gary S permalink

    Read T. Freke and P. Gandy “The Jesus Mysteries”, etc.. Original Christianity not about the worship of a man, but about becoming the Christ within–requiring the “death” of the ego. Revelatory!!

  15. john permalink

    what a lot crap this is , http://www.ratfacedjews.com is a zionist organization, do some home work you idiot, you lazy zionist MF

    • Great! Show us the money, I’m always on the lookout for good shit.

  16. caperash permalink

    Re: “The ultra rich and their ‘New World Order’ only exist to show us what happens if we worship the false gods of Power, Sex, Money, Fame, Security, Nationalism, etc.” This is a key, core insight for which I thank you. More of us need to grock this to avoid being caught in the endless cognitive loop, or trap, of ‘us’ versus ‘them’, the collective version of self vs. other. By identifying with a distinct, separated self, everything that is not self becomes other, meaning also that God/Nature/Aliveness is other and is fundamentally not alive in some way. But they have Power, and this once-removed power is what we refer to – however sloppily these days given our diverse cultures – as ‘gods’. But their power is mainly in various ways we have channeled life forces into conceptual structures, for the identification of the bipolar world of self and other is the fundamental grammar of concept/ideation over reality/being. Something like that.

    We get the Gods/Masters/Slavery/Enlightenment we have mutually created.

    The fundamental truth that has to be remembered is that every person, place and thing is infinitely connected with every other person, place and thing. That is a form of sacred view. And nowadays, since they have successfully split so-called ‘Church’ and so-called ‘State’, Sacred View is essentially verboten. And thus the Dark Age flourishes. Even the ‘good people’ deploring the ‘evil people’ are complicit, as you have well pointed out.

  17. Nixon Scraypes permalink

    A few weeks ago I wrote in my diary- the battle against the new world order is inextricably linked to the battle against the self, the ego ( the self as apprehended by the self). Now I read you saying the same thing . There seems to be some universal knowledge,perhaps it’s part of what we call God. It’s so good to hear you broadcast it. The idea has found it’s time,only love can save us now.Blessings

    • Thank you Nixon.

      This is a blog about the monetary aspects of the struggle. But it is impossible to fight a battle correctly if you don’t know in which war you are.
      So I sometimes take these little outings………

  18. Joakim permalink

    Excellent dissection of the current state of the world. Some years ago after an accident I experienced an NDE during which I was made aware that all life was an expression of Love
    and that loving is the only way to liberation. Trying to convey to others, what Love actually means
    in this respect, has been the greatest obstacle I have encountered but even if one single person
    is awaken to this knowledge, all efforts are well worth it. It is indeed an spiritual war, but the opposition are doing their best to divert people’s attention from looking within, thus distracting them
    and shaping societies to believe that all is possible and permissible and that money and power are the only things worth pursuing.

  19. Harbinger permalink

    Anthony,

    It’s a good read from someone with an open mind. There are lots of sites which have very good articles out there. Mike Delaney’s main site is Zionist Crime Factory and there are some brilliant articles there, especially his ‘Jew World Order’ epic essay. Now many will be put off by his clear dislike of Jews, which reminds me of a one Stephen Whittle, who has a clear concern of the dangers of migration many will see as a racist (who wrote under the pseudonym of Luke O’Farell over at heretical.com) but regardless, both do speak mountains of truth.

    Lastly, yes, I’ve done quite a bit of reading into the twelve lost tribes of Israel. In fact what got me interested was speaking to a knowledgeable man and mentioning the ‘Judeo-Christian’ west. He corrected me stating that it is the Israelite-Christian west. The Israelites ARE not Jews. Only one of the twelve lost tribes are and are the true Jews, the descendants of Judah. The Britons, like the rest of the Celts, Angles, Saxons, Norse etc are believed to be the lost tribes and it is for this very reason they are being obliterated by ‘those who call themselves Jews but are not’, the Pagan converts to Talmudic Judaism, the Khazars, because they have always been freedom loving peoples who have always opposed tyranny. I also recommend reading Michael Hoffman who has written a great book on Jews.

    Some links:

    http://www.zioncrimefactory.com/jew-world-order/
    http://www.truthcontrol.com/articles/ancient-history-black-nobility
    http://www.amazon.com/Judaism-Discovered-Anti-Biblical-Self-Worship-Superstition/dp/0970378459

    • Harbinger permalink

      P.S.

      I’ve posted over at ZCF but I’m no national socialist (Nazi). I’m an Anarcho-Nationalist as I do not believe in the state and its control over all. They are fascists at ZCF in the definition of the word which does hold admirable qualities but the following quote from Mussolini’s Doctrine of Fascism put me off, promoting what it is at its core:

      “The Fascist conception of the State is all-embracing; outside of it no human or spiritual values can exist, much less have value. Thus understood, Fascism is totalitarian, and the Fascist State—a synthesis and a unit inclusive of all values—interprets, develops, and potentiates the whole life of a people.”

      As for Hitler, well I’m still reading up on him. Yes, he was no more a dictator than Churchill or Roosevelt and certainly can never be compared to Stalin, but looking at the bigger picture he was no different to a William Wallace or a Joan of Arc in the respect he fought to protect his people. And as for Dunkirk, well, I found the following very interesting:

      “When I look around to see how we can win the war I see that there is only one sure path. We have no Continental army which can defeat the German military power.. Should [Hitler].. not try invasion [of Britain].. there is one thing that will bring him back and bring him down, and that is an absolutely devastating, exterminating attack by very heavy bombers from this country upon the Nazi homeland. We must be able to overwhelm them by this means, without which I do not see a way through. We cannot accept any aim lower than air mastery. When can it be obtained?” [Extract from Winston S Churchill The Second World War (Volume 2 Their Finest Hour Appendix A), Memo from Prime Minister to Minister of Aircraft Production, 8.July 1940].

      ADOLF HITLER in May 1940

      Britain and France declared war on Germany, not the other way around. Hitler actually wanted peace with Britain, as the German generals admitted (Basil Liddell Hart, The Other Side of the Hill 1948, Pan Books 1983) with regard to the so-called Halt Order of 24 May 1940 at Dunkirk, where Hitler had the opportunity to capture the entire British Army, but chose not to. Liddell Hart, one of Britain’s most respected military historians, quotes the German General von Blumentritt with regard to this Halt Order:

      “He (Hitler) then astonished us by speaking with admiration of the British Empire, of the necessity for its existence, and of the civilization that Britain had brought into the world. He remarked, with a shrug of the shoulders, that the creation of its Empire had been achieved by means that were often harsh, but ‘where there is planing, there are shavings flying’. He compared the British Empire with the Catholic Church – saying they were both essential elements of stability in the world. He said that all he wanted from Britain was that she should acknowledge Germany’s position on the Continent. The return of Germany’s colonies would be desirable but not essential, and he would even offer to support Britain with troops if she should be involved in difficulties anywhere..” (p 200).

      According to Liddell Hart, “At the time we believed that the repulse of the Luftwaffe in the ‘Battle over Britain’ had saved her. That is only part of the explanation, the last part of it. The original cause, which goes much deeper, is that Hitler did not want to conquer England. He took little interest in the invasion preparations, and for weeks did nothing to spur them on; then, after a brief impulse to invade, he veered around again and suspended the preparations. He was preparing, instead, to invade Russia” (p140).

      David Irving in the foreword to his book The Warpath (1978) refers to “the discovery.. that at no time did this man (Hitler) pose or intend a real threat to Britain or the Empire.”

      • Thanks Harbinger.

        Hitler’s infatuation with the Empire is actually one of the key reasons why it is clear, to my mind, that he was a complete stooge.

        Britain had been known as the ‘perfidious Albion’ for centuries even before Hitler. Like Rothschild (seems to have) said: ‘He who controls the British Money Supply controls the British Empire. And I control the British Money Supply’.

        The idea that Hitler would not have realized that the City was (and is) the capital of the big bad ‘International Jew’ that he was supposed to combat is really very hard to stomach. My gut can’t handle it, anyway.

        Here’s a link to a book on the UK by a German, it’s from 1916: Vampire of the Continent: http://www.yamaguchy.com/library/reventlow/vampire_01.html

        • Harbinger permalink

          Thank you Anthony,

          Much does seem to point to Hitler being in collusion with the British. It is very plausible that Hitler was created to be the faux antithesis of the International (false) Jew Banking empire (crown controlled by Rothschild) in order to bring about world war in order to loan out money to make profit; not forgetting that it would kill millions of white europeans, thus promoting the NWO agenda of Malthusian depopulation. It was Lenin who said the best way to beat your enemy is to control them (I think). I have also read of his meetings with the Tavistock Institute also, which may very well imply mind control. I am still reading into Hitler and the allied force’s lies about the third reich and Germans and finding the best source of information from that of the Germans. I highly recommend going to the following website as it tells much we weren’t taught of Hitler and WW2:

          http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archivesindex.html

          It was the article on Hitler’s attempting to make peace with the west, eight times, that can give argument to your theory Anthony. After all, Hitler may very well have realised that a culling of whites was very much what the International Jew wanted but had he not brought a war about, communism would have won (which it did). He had no choice really as his attempts at peace were flatly refused. He knew that the English were cousins. National Socialism is the nemesis of international socialism. If you also look into Reich policy they were anti homosexuality, paedophilia, immigration, pro marriage and family. All of these are anti NWO.

          What better way for the NWO to win but to give out disinformation on Hitler and the third reich? It may very well be that Hitler wasn’t a stooge and people like Sutton may be incorrect on their hypothesis. After all what if he truly was anti NWO and anti banking control of the world? What if he was another Abraham Lincoln and a true patriot? What better way to demoralise hope by saying all who fought against the elites were controlled stooges? The jury’s still out for me on Hitler and the third reich.

          • Yeah I’m with you Harb on that. I DO see Anthony’s point though…..I find it so frustrating to think that Hitler could have easily taken London…take the Brits prisoner at Dunkirk….drop a few paratroopers into RAF bases and walk into London ( if you watch a couple of episodes of Cac’s Army you will get the point) and line up Rothschild’s and explain to the Brits that THOSE are the war criminals. If you think about it Hitler was fine with Petain running France and he would only have to get rid of Churchill and the war/jew group that was pushing war. I think Hitler was a great man but all men have flaws and Hitler was just plain naive with regard to the British aristocracy….they are and always have been scumbags and Churchill was one of them …I am reading Christa Schroeder s bio and she said herself that Hitler had a soft spot for the English. Irving notes that Hitler was outraged when he went to Italy to see how the Italian Aristocracy looked down their noses at Mussolini …but the Italians are amateurs when it comes to ladded gentry….the Brit Aristocracy are the masters and Hitler could have delivered us from them. My French step dad was always embarrassed by how LITTLE resistance there was in France to the Germans and how much hatred there was for the Americans

            • Dads Army..not Cacs Army

    • zioncrimefactory2 permalink

      @ Harbinger

      Mike Delaney aka Prothink hosts my website http://www.zioncrimefactory.com/, but he does not run it. All of the content of the site is mine and I have no contributing writers either. Whatever you see on the site is my work: http://www.zioncrimefactory.com/about/

      I’ve given plenty of radio interviews, also posted on the site, so if you cannot distinguish between the voice of Prothink and I then I suggest you get your ears checked….

      – ZCF

  20. Absolutely brilliant article, Anthony.

    Spot on.

    The power of the Satanic order we see around us is a manifestation of the compromises we have made (or been seduced into making) with the worst egocentric instincts in ourselves.

    We are, ultimately, all one even though outcomes for individuised components (i.e. us) may vary hugely in the short term (and perhaps the eternal).

    • Great Kev, thanks much!

  21. So true, the battle is on and it is a spiritual one! But it is manifested here in the physical. And our actions on the physical plane is also part of the battle ….. we will talk soon!

    • Not of this world, but most assuredly in it!

      Thanks Einar!

  22. “We Jews, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers forever…………nothing the Gentiles do will meet our needs, our demands. We need a World of our own.” Maurice Samuel.

    Anyone who thinks that the Jews are not intent on ruling the World – with an iron rod – had better wake up.

    They are hellish beings, deranged and vicious and we had better understand this clearly before it is too late – though they have corrupted our World – OUR World – so thoroughly now that I believe only Mother Nature can do anything about it – and I would much rather She did than that the young of today should have to face what they have planned for us all.

    Unless you think it is Ok for five year old children, innocent children, to be instructed in how homosexuals “have sex” – which is now happening in California and the parents have NO SAY in whether their children attend such classes or not.

    Bette wake up!

    • Hi Astraea,
      ‘t is true what you write: Jewish Supremacism is pretty ugly.
      But it’s also true that there are many Jews out there who are not part of the plot and are living normal and constructive lives. Just as there are many Gentile ‘elitists’ raping little children and considering that a normal privilege of power.

      We’re talking about human nature more than anything else. Organized Jewry is, more than anything else, a mirror for ourselves.

      • zioncrimefactory2 permalink

        The “New World Order” agenda is Jewish, fueled by Jewish motivations for Jewish gain. Yes, they recruit corrupt non-Jews to serve their ends. That doesn’t take away from the fundamental reality that without the Jews this globalist conspiracy would not exist.

        Jews need to be kicked out of power and permanently barred from all positions of influence in banking, media, politics and so forth. If you disagree with that contention then you are working for the enemy and serve his ends.

  23. Hitler was not funded by the Jews – or the Rothschilds, he was not a Rothschild. He was not a Jew and he was not a hiomosexual!

    There is an awful we – and you – do not know or understand about Hitler and Germany. Go to see the very interesting collection of literature at http://www.barnesreview.org

    I think Putin would be well advised to read and follow Hitler’s ideas for Russia’s sake!

    Hitler was NOT a dictator.

    Go and read “Hitler Democrat.” by General Leon Degrelle.

    • I don’t agree. I’m not sure about his bloodline connections, although there are serious indications he was very close to them.
      But it is a well documented fact of history that Wall Street financed Hitler. There is a curious little book out there by Sidney Warburg that you should not miss out on.

      And Hitler was a dictator, there is no point in denying it. He killed hundreds of thousands of the infirm, and aggressively combated opposition against his rule. Just think of what happened to his generals who wanted to get rid of him in 1944. It is true that most Germans supported him, but those that didn’t did not have an easy life.

      Think of the US: we agree it’s a police state. Most Americans still fall for the ‘land of the free’ story.

      But it’s also very true that Hitler was not the anti-christ and that for an average German life under his rule was good. just like in the US, even today. Compared to Stalin he was an angel.

      Also we must come to terms with the fact that the war gave the Money Power everything it wanted: Israel, the destruction of German nationalism, the EU, the Cold War, Soviet domination of Eastern Europe.

      Bitter experience shows time and again that this is no coincidence.

      • No, it’s not well documented. Sutton made use of the Sidney Warburg myth to portray Hitler as being funded by Wall Street. Michael Collins Piper has dealt with this in his book “Those Who Reign Supreme”:
        http://www.zioncrimefactory.com/2012/04/17/michael-collins-piper-demolishes-kosher-anti-hitler-myths/
        http://www.amfirstbooks.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=54

        Who financed the NSDAP and Hitler has also been covered by Veronica Clark and Henry Ashby Turner:
        http://inconvenienthistory.com/archive/2011/volume_3/number_3/demystification_of_the_birth_of_the_nsdap.php
        http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v08/v08p369_Ries.html

        The generals who wanted to get rid of Hitler were basically responsible for the deaths of many thousands of German soldiers. By acting the way that they did, they effectively harmed the German war effort. Their conspiracy began long before 1944. This has been dealt with here: http://wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/worminapple/wa00.html

        Basically, Churchill was the reason that Germany wasn’t able to enter into an alliance with Britain. It was definitely possible to do so and there were many people in parliament who wanted friendship with Germany. Churchill was paid by the Jewish pressure group “The Focus” to get Britain into war with Germany. You can read about this here (ignore the letter by Brüning, a known Hitler hater and “anti-Nazi”, as untrustworthy as Strasser):
        http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v07/v07p498_Okeefe.html

        Operation Barbarossa was ruined in part because of the Italian invasion of Greece etc, which stalled the German invasion of the Soviet Union and forced Germany to first come to Italy’s rescue.

        On page 153 in his memoirs, Keitel writes:
        “Even if it was too much to ask of our good fortune that Italy should have stayed out of the war altogether as a benevolent neutral, just consider the difference if Hitler had been able to prevent their irresponsible attack on Greece. What would we not have saved by way of aid to Italy for her senseless Balkan war? In all probability there would not have been any uprising in Yugoslavia in an attempt to force her entry into the war on the side of the enemies of the Axis, just to oblige Britain and the Soviet Union. How differently things would then have looked in Russia in 1941. We would have been in a far stronger position, and above all we should not have lost those two months. Just imagine: we would not have frozen to a standstill in the snow and ice, with temperatures of minus forty-five degrees just twenty miles outside Moscow, a city hopelessly encircled from the north, west and south, at the end of that November. We should have had two clear months before that infernal cold weather closed in – and there was nothing like it in the winters that followed anyway!”

        Hitler himself said this about Moscow and the Ukraine:
        “Still more important was the thrust of Army Group South. The spreading out of the tank and rapid-unit forces into the distant space had to be executed twice. We had to obtain the harvest of the fertile Ukraine, the wheat and the oil from the giant sunflower fields, for our troops and the nation.

        The second North-South thrust from Army Group South was aimed toward the raw materials—the coal, iron ore, chromium and manganese, and the important power plants at the Dnieper and Donez region all the way to Rostow and the Black Sea. There, right at the raw material sources, were also located the industrial centers, a concentration of the Russian armament industry and its economic power.”

        And he said:
        “Way back, a military personality once gave me the advice that, from an army general upwards obedience decreases and any order is subject to a personal critique. I often had the same experience.

        Again and again I noticed that my generals, in their deliberations, completely disregarded the political, geo-political and economic matters. Mostly, they kept to a purely military viewpoint, and that turned out to be traumatic when directed towards Moscow in the Russian campaign.

        As I found out later, my generals insinuated that I reflected a Napoleon-related Moscow shyness. Yet, by no means did I misjudge the military and political importance of taking Moscow; but first, the prerequisite for that were successful attacks toward the North and South, those two strategic pillars. Then, Moscow might be the last stage of the gigantic Russian undertaking.

        The time favorable for mobile warfare ran out—the valuable time—it was always too little time and too much space in this war.

        At the end of September, when I was healthy again, I could still push through one of the flank-and-encirclement thrusts toward the South. That operation I had to literally wrestle from my generals—yes, I had to enforce it by harsh orders. The result: four Russian armies were destroyed, and 650,000 prisoners taken. Even that success did not convince my generals of the only possible strategy within the vast Russian distances.

        Against my inner conviction, they set up the frontal offensive against Moscow. Moscow was never in my mind, but they would or could not understand that.

        To carry the great strategy through, it was, however, too late. The offensive toward Moscow met an increasingly stiffened Russian defense. Our divisions, tired and weakened by the month-long hard battles, had the target before their eyes and clashed against fresh Siberian forces continually moving in from the far regions.

        The frontal offensive toward Moscow lost its momentum against the massive Russian defense. Soon afterward, the front froze in snow and icy cold; the winter equipment, ordered in time, never reached the troops.

        Now my generals were for retreat, which meant a Napoleon-like end. The catastrophe.”

        Source: http://carolynyeager.net/ein-anderer-hitler-hermann-giesler-barbarossa

        You may criticize these aims and this strategy in hindsight, but to me it sounds legitimate.

        That Hitler wouldn’t build the bomb stems from a false quote, as far as I know, in which he supposedly said that such a weapon would be too horrible and brutal. In reality, the Germans were simply not capable of developing the bomb at the time.

        Was Hitler a dictator? He probably was, but maybe he wasn’t. I don’t really care. Read here for more: http://wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/dictator/dictator00.html

        I am not sure about Gibraltar. I would imagine that Hitler didn’t want to offend the Spanish by taking it, in part because the Germans hoped that Spain would enter into the war on their side, as repayment for helping to crush Jewish communism and Freemasonry (!) in the Spanish Civil War. Moreover, it is well known that the German Navy simply wasn’t able to compete with the British et al. after 1941.

        I haven’t seen any credible sources which prove that Bormann was a spy. So, there is no proof for this; it is really just a theory based on belief.

        As for Dunkirk: “German land forces might have pressed their attack on the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) and the Allies, especially having secured the ports of Calais and Boulogne. For years, it was assumed that Adolf Hitler ordered the German Army to stop the attack, favouring bombardment by the Luftwaffe. However, according to the Official War Diary of Army Group A, Generalfeldmarschall Gerd von Rundstedt – the Chief of the General Staff, disconcerted by the vulnerability of his flanks and supply to his forward troops, ordered the halt. Hitler merely validated the order several hours after the fact.”

        Hitler validated the order because he still hoped to achieve peace with Britain. He even had Hess fly to Britain for peace in 1941. The Germans knew though, that it would be difficult to achieve peace with Britain, as long as Churchill was in power.
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rudolf_Hess#Attempted_peace_mission

        Dunkirk was of course a mistake, but Hitler was only human after all. He definitely made some mistakes, and this was one of them. It would have been very strange if he made no mistakes, so I don’t think it’s logical to say that he must have been a puppet because he made mistakes.

        If all of this is not enough to change your views, then you probably have some special interest in maintaining these myths about Hitler and National Socialism. That may sound like the typical “black-and-white Nazi thinking”. But really, I think this is a solid argument.

        • Thanks, interesting stuff. I don’t see Piper offer proof for saying Warburg’s book is a fraud. It’s possible though. A few years ago it was suddenly published here in Holland. I got a copy and read it, it was amusing, but it was weird that it was suddenly there, of course.

          Be that as it may: I don’t believe in full control conspiracy. It’s not like all the puppets are just robotic little extensions of the one will. The manipulation is far more intricate.

          It’s not just about Israel or zionism. Focusing on Zionism as a homeland for the Jews is a ruse: Zionism is the conquest of everything. So the ‘Zionists’ as Piper writes about are just a very small part of the equation. It’s quite clear that these ‘Zionists’ did everything in their power to infuriate the Nazi’s and they did not have to work together to get what they want: desperate Jews trying to get out of Europe.

          To say Adolf Hitler is the father of Israel is true, but just a very small part of the picture. He was also the father of the EU, of the Cold War, of the Soviet boot on Eastern Europe, of the destruction of German Nationalism.

          Thus: the 2nd World War gave the Money Power everything it wanted. Even if Hitler was completely benevolent (which I don’t believe) he would still stand out as the greatest example of how not to do it.

        • I’ve been doing some background checking on this Sidney Warburg booklet. It’s actually a little amazing it got published again in Holland a few years back. I’ve got some info here in dutch: http://www.terugnaardebron.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=5046
          Shell was involved and after the booklet was republished, they commented that it has never been ‘scientifically proven’ that they were involved: they do not deny it.

          It transpires that there are only a few copies of the original left and one lost copy was with a dutch historian.

          Here’s some interesting analysis: http://reformed-theology.org/html/books/wall_street/chapter_10.htm
          It accepts Sidney Warburg did not exist, but investigates what the book was really about and what was its goal.

          • funnily enough the last source I gave is Sutton himself…….

            Meaning it’s not fair to say that Sutton based this book on Warburg’s hoax: he analyzes it to be a hoax, although containing much good information.

        • While it is undoubtedly true that many in Britain, including among the elite, admired Hitler and Germany, it is not right to say it was just Churchill that hindered cooperation.

          It was the City and Churchill was only one of their stooges. It was Chamberlain who guaranteed Poland, with the clear aim of getting the war he wanted: Polish revanchism after being split up several times between Germany and Russia was untenable: The British guarantee bolstered Polish adventurism and they relished the idea of war.

          How stupid.

          They fell for it and got hammered in a few weeks. Britain did nothing, of course. It couldn’t do anything and never intended to do anything, it just wanted war.

          The fact that the City owns Britain is quite clear to anybody studying ‘the international Jew’. It was common knowledge in those days. So how come Hitler ignored all that and just focused on Anglo/German brotherhood?

          And we can take it a step further too: if Hitler was so right about the Jews conquering Russia through Marxism, then why did he want to fight a war of extermination against the Slavs?

          Why didn’t he give every able bodied Ukrainian a gun? They would have happily marched to Moscow, the Holodomor had been less than a decade earlier.

          Was it just because the Slavs are untermenschen? We’re not going that way, are we?

          So the aryan British are forgiven their capitalism and are naively invited on board, while the poor slavs, suffering from Bolshevism are just good suppliers of Lebensraum?

          Something’s wrong here. And it’s big too.

  24. Robert permalink

    I found an example of ADL/B’nai Brith great success.

    Please look here: http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t890658/ “Glupi Albanci” means “Stupid Albanians”.

    We know that destruction of Yugoslavia was a classical Organized Jewry Op. But promotion of hatred against Albanians who accidentally might have benefited from this Jewish plot is completely counterproductive. Of course common Albanians did not benefit from collapse of Yugoslavia. Just few criminals.

    Albanians are poor and weak, they do not speak English, so laughing at them is so exciting. Typical Sacha Baron Cohen – style humor.

    Americans had Polish jokes, now they have Mexican jokes. We do not make any spiritual progress. ADL and B’nai B’rith win.

    ANTHONY – WHAT DO YOU WANT TO SAY?

    (Thinking) people in the world know the problem. The world is organized according to Satanic rules.

    Some people (Ahmed, Lonnie, Dana Antiochus and Salman Hossain here: http://www.totalfascism.com/an-open-invitation-to-anti-zionists-to-join-the-real-antisemite-movement/) know that the answer should be GLOBAL.

    Is Jesus Christ the answer? And what should we do then? Please remember that Christ’s message is not universal. Many people say that Holy Prophet Muhammad’s interpretation of God is better.

  25. Robert permalink

    “The problem is not Jewry. It’s not even Usury. It’s Ego. This is a spiritual war. The forces of self vs. those crucifying self.”

    I like this attitude. Let’s assume that spiritual acpect is the most important one. Then what should we do? Be completely passive p***ies as Jesus Christ advised? If yes – aren’t you (and all of us) wasting (y)our time?

    We do not make any progress. We still ask the same question: is it all about Jews?

    From internal perspective – NOT. Jew Henry Makow declares that he had been deceived (http://www.henrymakow.com/confessions-of-a-luciferian-jew.html). But he also says that there must be a secret society (societies) hidden deep in the structures of Organized Jewry. They create this culture. Their god is certainly the set of ideas or spirit we call Satan or Lucifer.

    From external perspective – YES? Could you imagine assasination of Tsar Alexander II Romanov in 1881 without Jews? Could you imagine Bolshevik Revolution without Jews? Could you imagine present destruction of Syria, Libya or Iraq without Jews?

    You qoute Andrew Anglin of http://www.totalfascism.com. In the beginning he quotes Mein Kampf. The mass social movement should have one true and simple message. Intellectual deliberations are a waste of time.

    His glorification of Adolf Hitler seems ridiculous. But National Socialism (esp. in Gottfried Feder’s interpretation) sounds reasonable. I would love to live in a country organized according to Feder’s rules. Hitler certainly made mistakes. But was he a traitor? Anglin uses Hitler as their god because he needs simple message and universal god, in my opinion this god would not unite them.

    Anglin makes mistakes. Interpretation of the society in pure racial terms (http://www.totalfascism.com/race-exist/) is outdated and goofy. “Culture” is sufficuent to describe everything that happens. Muslims did not need this “race” and they have impressive experience with Jews. Their racial obsession iwill probably be used to discredit this movement (being a media Jew I would use this “race”).

    Here (http://www.totalfascism.com/an-open-invitation-to-anti-zionists-to-join-the-real-antisemite-movement/) in the comments section there is an interesting discussion about White Supremacy. Ahmad, Lonnie, Dana Antiochus and Salman Hossain call for global anti-Jewish movement. White Supremacy is an idea to divide people, classical “divide et impera” in action.

    I do not know whether Andre Anglin is corruped shill or useful idiot. I guess the later. But ADL and B’nai B’rith love White Nationalism and White Supremacy for sure.

    • Hi Robert,

      It’s an unfortunate situation that people seem to think that Jesus wants us to be passive! What could be further from the truth than that?!??! Didn’t Jesus go out there and talk to people about what was going on? With themselves? With the pharisees? Did he not patiently knot a whip and use that to kick the money changers out of the temple? And by doing so rocking the core of temporal power?

      Here’s how Michael Hoffman puts it:
      “And then they are going in as social justice people who are concerned for the poor they are going to go along and palliate the wounds of those people who have been injured by interest on debt. There is a satanic level of mockery there. It is satanic ridiculing of us. Because Jesus intended that we would be overcomers here, that we would be a light unto the world. Instead we make a mockery of the Gospel by these shortcuts that we take….The inability to have faith in God.”

      Jesus wants us to be overcomers. To fight evil.
      But one of the key messages Jesus brought was, that ‘we cannot follow him if we do not take up the cross’. And for what is the cross? To crucify self on.

      There are two basic voices in us: self and the Christ. We live self, but we must live Christ. And the Christ is no sissy. It’s the Christ that defeated Satan.

      • a few lines i wrote the 9th of december:

        money out of politics or jews out of the arms trade .. which would you
        prefer??

        jesus is reported to have said to give the emperor what is the emperor’s
        (property/brandmark) but he was being ironic; he might as well have
        counseled to turn some imposition or other into the lost and found; the
        wiser thing is not to lose what is yours; iow, he meant one shouldn’t
        delegate any aspect of autonomy. Refuse it in the first place, so as not to
        have to struggle free from some foreign element that posesses one through
        lending the impression it’s (in) one’s possession or should be or whatev
        permut. thereof.

      • Robert permalink

        Jesus says different things. Copy-paste exersice:

        We have stuff like below (Mat 5:10-12):
        “Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness’ sake: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake. Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you.”

        Later (Mat 5:39):
        “That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.”

        And (Mat 22:21):
        “Render therefore unto Ceasar the things which are Caesar’s; and unto God the things that are God’s.”

        This is what he says. And Jesus in action (John 2:13-16):
        “And the Jews’ passover was at hand, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem. And found in the temple those that sold oxen and sheep and doves, and the changers of money sitting: And when he had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them all out of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the changers’ money, and overthrew the tables; And said unto them that sold doves, Take these things hence; make not my Father’s house an house of merchandise.”

        This is not a coherent message.

        I understand that the reason Christ was chosen as god by Rome is this obedience. Always convenient for the rulers.

        To sum up your dicussion with Andre – I believe he is right to some extent. Your individual spiritual fight with Organized Jewry will never be effective. We have Sons od Devil (Christ’s metaphor) corrupting the society. Hitler’s answer to this problem (national spiritual struggle) was appropriate. You shall know them by their fruits – he used proper method and achieved amazing results.
        Andre is wrong since his White Nationalism is very poor interpretation of National Socialism.

        • “We have Sons od Devil (Christ’s metaphor) corrupting the society. Hitler’s answer to this problem (national spiritual struggle) was appropriate. You shall know them by their fruits – he used proper method and achieved amazing results.”

          Well, Robert: that’s the problem I have with Hitler. His fruits. He was the father of the EU, Israel, the Soviet boot over Eastern Europe, the destruction of German Nationalism as a force, massive all out indebtedness, the US unable to extricate itself from the world and of course 60 million deaths.

          Hitler gave the Money Power absolutely everything it ever dreamed of and probably more too.

          • Chris permalink

            Rubbish Anthony. Absolute rubbish

            Read Mien kampf some time. Unfortunately people will read your comment and take it as gospel.

            http://mk.christogenea.org/

            • In all fairness Chris: I have read Mein Kampf. I enjoyed it too, although the second half got a little boring. But Mein Kampf is his promis, reality his legacy and his legacy is what I described.

              • It’s not just Mein Kampf Anthony. Hitler was consistent in everything he did. You’re taking conjecture and passing it off as fact. You sound like Makow.

                Hitler was not financed by Jews. He was not part Jew. He wasn’t gay etc with all the other Jewish lies. All been completely discredited.

                He did everything to prevent war.

                Hitler’s War – What the Historians Neglect to Mention

                Hitler – The greatest story NEVER told!

                “The victor will never be asked if he told the truth”. – AH

    • Andrew Anglin of Total Fascism and Mike Delaney of Prothink.org are anti-white agents. They are controlled opposition much like Ron Paul. They are trying to make whites who are racially conscious and aware of the genocide being committed against them by Jews look like lunatics.

      Here are some links that should be of interest to those who wish to seek the truth about who is to blame:

      http://web.archive.org/web/20130103231509/http://zioncrimefactory.com/jew-world-order/

      http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Dalton-Nietzsche.html

      http://www.natvan.com/free-speech/fs9910c.html

      http://www.thetotalcollapse.com/have-jews-destroyed-the-world/

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Web Links | winteredge
  2. Confronting Anti-Hitler Fanatics: Incoherent Shill Anthony Migchels | Total Fascism

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: