Skip to content
Tags

Mutual Credit, the Astonishingly Simple Truth about Money Creation

January 3, 2012

Mutual Credit is the way money is created in barters worldwide. Barters don’t barter. They don’t use national currencies to finance their trade and that’s why they are called that way. But they use their own means of exchange to pay each other, so ‘barter’ is a misnomer.

It is an extremely cheap and simple way of creating money. Every participant is given an account and credit. Let’s say 1 Unit = 1 Dollar. This is actually how many of these systems work: it creates transparent pricing by using the national currency as the unit of account, but not as a means of exchange.

Let’s say every participant gets a 1000 Unit credit. In the beginning there is no money at all. It only comes into circulation when one of the participants uses his credit to pay another participant. If he uses his 1000 Units his balance is – 1000 U. His supplier’s balance is now +1000U. The total amount in circulation is now also 1000 U. This means there is always exactly as much in circulation as there is outstanding credit: a zero sum game.

If you understand the very primitive LETS, you basically understand how money should work. It really is that simple. Galbraith was not kidding when he said “The study of money, above all other fields in economics, is one in which complexity is used to disguise truth or to evade truth, not to reveal it. The process by which banks create money is so simple the mind is repelled. With something so important, a deeper mystery seems only decent”.
But there is no deeper mystery. This is it.

One of the key reasons why privately operated barter units are not dominating in the real economy, is because until recently there was no known mechanism to create convertibility to other units, most importantly the national units. Amazingly, many of these barters actively resist convertibility and believe non-convertibility is a strength. It is not, of course, as it hinders the liquidity of the unit.
Lately, however, the right way to convertibility has been shown by Bitcoin and the Gelre: on-line markets where the units can be traded in a free market environment is the solid way forward.

Let’s explore a number of items to elucidate the matter.

1. Zero reserves are required
Therefore, the Mutual Credit Facility (MCF) does not need savers. It does not need to attract outside capital. It does not incur capital costs in creating credit. It can therefore operate interest free.

2. Mutual Credit Facilities typically finance themselves with monthly fees. These can be very low, about 10 dollars a month. Of course the outlet does need a minimum numbers of participants to be effective and acquire sufficient income to operate. But with only a thousand firms participating, already a viable business is possible.

3. Governments can easily create National Currencies using Mutual Credit. Commonwealths on other levels can do so too.

4. Debts that are not repaid lead to unbacked units in circulation. The cost for taking these out of circulation can be covered by taking a small one off fee when the credit is assigned. Defaults typically amount to 2% of total outstanding credit.

5. Serious sums of credit are backed by collateral.

6. The creditworthiness of participants is much higher than with banking, because debtors are not burdened with interest.

7. In the case of payment problems, Mutual Credit Facilities will typically not act in the same barbaric ways that banks do. The debt does not grow if repayment is lagging, because there is no interest. If a debtor defaults, underlying assets will be liquidated, but in the  way least harmful to the debtor.

8. The MCF is intrinsically stable: it cannot provide more credit than it has assets, because it has no assets. Even if the MCF goes bust because it cannot finance it’s own operation, all the outstanding debts will be repaid and settled in other currencies. People holding the defunct units can expect to be (almost) fully reimbursed, even though this may take some time.

9. MCFs should preferably be Not for Profit entities. But commercial MCFs certainly are possible too.

10. There are no laws to stop Mutual Credit in the marketplace. But of course regulators are inimical to them.

11. MCF units can have their own unit of account (like with LETS), or they can use the National Unit as such.

12. MCF units are a means of exchange and should never be hoarded. They should be converted to other currencies, precious metals, durable goods, invested or used in other ways when people want to store wealth.

13. Mutual Credit is peer to peer. The MCFs exists only to see to the administration it brings. It is fundamentally democratic.

It is in this incredibly simple way that humanity can finance itself interest free. We can get rid of interest, not by outlawing it, but by creating all the cash we will ever need at zero cost.

We don’t need interest, there is no economic need for it and fully functional ways of creating credit without it are available now.

It will make obsolete capital markets, speculation, and exploitation through artificial scarcity. It ends the losses to inflation. It allows decentralized control of the economy.

It only needs growing awareness and dedicated people to implement it.

Mutual Credit for the 21st century: Convertibility

19 Comments
  1. Liam B Allone permalink

    What about the gap? How will LETS solve the problem of being able to repay that which is unrepayable? Producers will continuously need to rely on “someone” making up new credit to cover the outerwise-unrepayable B costs! I liked this idea when Tommy Kennedy came up with it a decade ago but he has never given me an answer to this question.

    Unless you can show me how LETS can effectively deal with the Producer’s GAP, I am certain that it cannot succeed. Producers will not be able to liquidate their inventories because they will not be able to come up with money to meet their B costs. (i.e. they don’t pay it out in LETS wages so it is not there to cover the whole price) Only Douglas and Soddy thought this aspect through in their solutions.

    Keynes acknowledged the gap but never addressed it or solved the problem. That’s why his model doesn’t work. Kennedy doesn’t even acknowledge the problem. Putting his head in the sand won’t make it go away.

    • Liam, could you please describe the GAP problem in your words? Preferably in a few sentences?

      Thanks.

    • tf2346 permalink

      ?if i understand your point. then: this “gap” problem is hidden as long as a particular system is recruiting new members (creating new credits), but would become very visible when the system is losing participants? i suppose an ideal system could keep growing until it is universal (or a member of a set of systems all of which are fully-convertible amongst each other), at which point the gap problem would disappear? [ps: what does the "B" stand for?]

      • We need to separate correct functioning of the money system from the question of social governance. A stable money system can be used in broke or prosperous economies, it does nothing to determine what happens it simply records transactions in a stable and accurate fashion and nothing that happens in the economy can interfere with its correct funcitoning. This is a fundamental issue, because the key function of measure that money provides requires that money be inert in order for it to be stable.. See: http://www.bibocurrency.org/English/The%20Scam%20short%20form.htm

        If you read the Passive BIBO Spec here: http://www.bibocurrency.org/English/standard.htm, accounts can only be closed when they are null and the definition of Debt in @ (@ is the passive bibo currency unit symbol) it says the following:

        Debt in @:

        A commitment vis-à-vis the Community resulting from a negative Balance to continue delivering Wealth in the future through Transactions Accounted in @ until the Balance is no longer negative

        Also rule number 3-b says: One can close an Account in @ provided the balance is null.

        This means that settlement of commitment in terms of real value is left up to a separate social governance that may apply whatever legal measures to guaranty value remains in the community. One clear way of achieving this, is to require that the commitment represented by a negative balance be guaranteed by the patrimony of the account holder. But that is entirely the prerogative of the governance of the community in question.

  2. All money is credit in circulation. There is no need for collateral because the credit is a sacred expression of trust between a people. The trick is when a third party ie central bank pretends to have authority over that “credit” shared trust. Riddle for your thought. Why would you pay someone ie central banks interest to watch you borrow your own money from yourself? Thanks Rduanewilling

    • Hi Duane!
      I’m quite sure that there will indeed be units that rely on trust only. In many respects the ‘softer’ the money is, the more effective it becomes.

      I do, however, believe that, especially in the early phases of the transition, trust is not enough. I’ve come to understand the Germans, who like to say: ‘Vertrauen ist gut, Controle ist besser’ (Trust is good, control is better).
      The point is that the 10% who don’t manage (or don’t want) to meet their obligations will disturb the rest.

      Experience shows this even in small time LETS systems, where small communities (lot of social control) suffer from this phenomenon.

  3. yes yes and yes,

    That is what a Passive BIBO (stable)Currency standard is about. A monetary ruler anyone can carry in their pockets. No need to control the units, all that is required is that the transactions are recorded.

    www,bibocurrency.org

    Marc

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Regional Currencies in Germany: the Chiemgauer « Real Currencies | The Germany Site
  2. Regional Currencies in Germany: the Chiemgauer « Real Currencies
  3. Real Currencies
  4. How about the Lectra? « Real Currencies
  5. Budget of an Interest Slave « Real Currencies
  6. Financial Warfare 2012: Boycott all Banks « Real Currencies
  7. The Inflation vs. Deflation Dialectic « Real Currencies
  8. Mutual Credit for the 21st century: Convertibility « Real Currencies
  9. Usurious Usurpation « Real Currencies
  10. Mutual Credit, the Astonishingly Simple Truth about Money Creation |
  11. Debt Free Money alone does not solve Compound Interest « Real Currencies

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 130 other followers